VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:19:49 08/28/09 Fri
Author: Kelsey
Subject: Re: The CBO says otherwise
In reply to: Shirley 's message, "Re: The CBO says otherwise" on 16:57:33 08/27/09 Thu

I know what unfunded means. What I'm trying to tell you is that it is impossible to have an "unfunded" tax cut. A tax cut is by definition a return of funds to their source.




>I find it difficult to believe you don't know what
>unfunded means! Unfunded means other programs or
>spending was not cut to compensate for the loss of tax
>revenue. Google David Walker, former US controller
>who lists the unfunded tax cuts, the Prescription Drug
>Plan and the Iraq War as the cause for increased
>deficits. He resigned a couple of years ago and is
>speaking all over the country.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.