VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:59:13 01/03/00 Mon
Author: Syrme... um... that just doesn't work for me
Subject: Happy New Year!!!

What? It's not still New Year's? It's Jan 3. Hmm... must be one of those damn Y2K glitches with the state of Indiana, screwing up my sense of time.

Well, I was out of town for a couple days, and this is the first time I've been on the internet this year, and despite the tardiness, I'd still like to wish everyone a happy new year, and a happy new millenium, despite the technical facts that may argue that the new millenium doesn't really begin until next year. Hey, we're seeing new digits here, and that's all that matters.

Anyone care to post New Year's resolutions? I resolve to not bind myself to any resolutions this year... doh!

Happy 2000 all. We shall see what this year has in store for us, and for SH.

Emrys
P.S. By the way, I think the whole Y2K deal was some sort of elaborate sham by someone. I was at a friend's house on New Year's Eve who had a really old computer (the friend had the computer... not the house). Anyway, it was a 386 (yes, apparantly some of them have still survived, scary as that may be) and it was running Windows 3.1 (which I didn't even know a 386 could do... I thought they were limited to Dosshell... remember Dosshell... those were the days). And it did just fine at the date rollover. What a crock! I was looking forward to seeing some circuits fry or something. It could have at least popped up some strange error messages, but alas, the 386 lives on. ::shutter::

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.