Re: New Directors for year 2003 Farm Board -- Farm People's Opinion Access

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:47:51 02/11/03 Tue
Author: Maggie
Subject: Re: New Directors for year 2003 Farm Board
In reply to: Bob 's message, "Re: New Directors for year 2003 Farm Board" on 18:26:49 01/30/03 Thu

Actually Teri Connolly used to be known as Teri McClure so it looks like all positions are open. But why should they start be honest now? After 2 months of written requests for documents I still have yet to see anything and their reasons are unacceptable let alone illegal.

>I thought there was to be five (5) open positions. We
>have Marie Taylor and Donna Rubes who have both
>completed their terms. And we have Bill Bradley, Ken
>Stroud and Bonnie Lasiw who stepped in as replacements
>for board members Gordon Cox, Phyllis Harper and
>Richard Sehnert who left during their terms. We
>elected Richard Sehnert, Terri Connolly and Ralph
>Bleeker last year while Donna Rubes, Marie Taylor,
>Phyllis Harper and Gordon Cox remained on the board to
>complete their terms. Since bill Bradley, Ken Stroud
>and Bonnie Lasiw were not voted into office by the
>membership, shouldn't they need to run for the board?
>And since Donna Rubes and Marie Taylor have completed
>their term, shouldn't they have to run again, if they
>wish to.
>
>I have no problem with the replacements, they have
>done a wonderful job and the board is great, but I
>just wanted to find out where I went wrong in my
>calculations.
>
>Thanks for your response in advance.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]