Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
Saturday, December 21, 05:12:42pm | [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ] |
Subject: Aircraft Refueling, B-52s, on outer perimeter,,U-Tapao,,Airfield | |
Author: George L Benton (help) | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 22:09:45 09/29/15 Tue I was station at U-Tapao, Airfield from May 1968-1970. maintaining portable Fuel storage bladders, which was located on the perimeter of the bast, next to a thick growth . that was sprayed with chemical to preventy surprise attacts. Also, prior to being assigned to U-Tapao I can in contact with c-123, equipped for for sprayinf agent orange in Vietnam. Today iam treated for many health problems, The Va denied my claim, stating just because an airplane flew over Vietnam didn't mean i had been exposed. To me that was an insult. I refiled my claim, asking for someone to do a fact check for aircraft refuelers, portable fuel storage bladders located on the perimeter U-Tapao. It has been over a year, no respons from the Va. If anyone out there can help, I would appreciate . [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
[> Subject: Re: Aircraft Refueling, B-52s, on outer perimeter,,U-Tapao,,Airfield | |
Author: Robert Vanderbeck (U-Tapao POL) [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 08:54:20 05/03/17 Wed I was in POL at U-Tapao from 1/68 - 1/69 >I was station at U-Tapao, Airfield from May >1968-1970. > > >maintaining portable Fuel storage bladders, which was >located on the perimeter of the bast, next to a thick >growth . that was sprayed with chemical to preventy >surprise attacts. Also, prior to being assigned to >U-Tapao >I can in contact with c-123, equipped for for sprayinf >agent orange in Vietnam. > >Today iam treated for many health problems, The Va >denied my claim, stating just because an airplane flew >over Vietnam didn't mean i had been exposed. To me that >was an insult. >I refiled my claim, asking for someone to do a fact >check >for aircraft refuelers, portable fuel storage bladders > located on the perimeter U-Tapao. It has been over a >year, no respons from >the Va. If anyone out there can help, I would >appreciate . [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |