Re: Question #1 -- The Apostolic Defender Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:29:56 10/01/02 Tue
Author: William Price
Subject: Re: Question #1
In reply to: Pastor Reckart 's message, "Re: Question #1" on 10:30:12 10/01/02 Tue

>The answer by PFP that the Law ended in 70AD is FALSE!
>
>The Law is the old Covenant and it was to be replaced
>by the New Covenant (Jer 31:31, Acts 3:22-23). If
>Jesus was not that Prophet and the New Covenant did
>not begin at Calvary, then there is no New Covenant,
>the Messiah has not come yet.
>Jesus pointed to the date, time, and event of the
>ushering in of the New Covenant when he instituted his
>Passover Memorial. He said: "This is the cup of the
>New Testament (Covenant), which is shed for many for
>the remission of sins" (Mat 26:28). If the blood of
>Jesus is the atonement and sanctification of the New
>Covenant, then remission of sins begins with Calvary
>and the Law ends. Jeuss said it was FINISHED when he
>spoke of the Law and his work of fulfillment.
>The blood of bulls, goats, lambs, and calves,
>officially ended at Calvary. If the Apostles believed
>the remission of sins remained with animal blood and
>practice of the Law until 70AD and the Law Covenant
>officiated until the destruction of the Temple,
>THEY NEVER TAUGHT IT! The Catholic Preterist
>heresy destroys the very emblematic power and
>testimony in the Lord's Supper that the Law ended when
>the New Covenant was ratified. Preterist would have
>the Apostles observing the Lord' Supper in
>rememberance of the New Testament being ratified while
>at the same time keeping the Law and offering up
>animal sacrifice until 70AD. This is heresy!
>
>PFP Wrote: "The Bible, and therefore preterism,
>teaches that the Law was to remain in effect, and
>every Jot and tittle practiced, until the parousia."
>
>Response: This is a false doctrine. The Word of God
>says the Law and the Prophets were until John, since
>then the Kingdom of God is preached and all men press
>into it (Luke 16:16). It is clear, that those who
>followed the Messiah were to depart from the
>priesthood, temple, and dominion of the law and enter
>into the Kingdom of God. Otherwise there is no sense
>in making the statement "the law was until John" when
>in fact men were to stay in it until 70AD and then
>AFTERWARD PRESS INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!
>Preterism is a heresy and it perverts the very intent
>of the Word of God in reard to the establishment of
>the New Covenant on Calvary.
>If the "parousia" occured in 70AD I want to see it
>proved. So far I have not found a Preterist to do it.
> I want them to prove Mathew 24:30 and Revelation 1:7
>fully occured in 70AD. I want them to prove these
>text.
>
>PFP wrote: " The Bible, and therefore preterism,
>affirms that the Old Covenant Law had not yet passed
>away as of the 60�s AD (Hebrews 8:13), and the
>Apostles continued to observe every jot and tittle of
>the Law as they were instructed to by their Master.
>
>Response: Antother false doctrine. The Word of God
>says the Law was added because of transgressions
>"UNTIL" the seed should come to whom the promises were
>made and it was ordained in the hands of a mediator
>(Gal 3:19). When Preterst claim the law remained past
>Calvary and in full force and effect to 70AD they
>nullify the work of the Mediator on the Cross. They
>totally destroy the work of the Cross for faith
>salvation and keep salvation in the works of the Law.
>This kind of false doctrine is what Paul wrote the
>whole book of Galatians against, the Judaizers. The
>Law was added at Mt. Sinai and it was substracted at
>Mt. Calvary. There was absolutely NO SALVATION in any
>part or portion of the Law after Calvary. The
>Apostles were sent to preach the Gospel of the Kingdom
>to all nations (Matthew 24:14), NOT TO GO PREACH THE
>LAW COVENANT UNTIL 70AD and its alleged end. The
>Preterist would have us believe the Law and Grace
>co-existed side by side and two Covenants were in
>existence at the same time. How else can they have it,
>if the Law continues until 70AD?
>
>PHP Wrote:
>(Acts 21:26) History confirms that the destruction of
>the temple rendered observation of the Mosaic covenant
>Law impossible.
>
>Response: Another false doctrine. History records no
>such lie. The Word of God says that at the
>crucifixion of Jesus the vail in the temple was rent
>it twain. Until this vail was replaced (they could not
>repair it, a new one had to be hung back up), all work
>of animal sacrifices and the daily work of prayers
>(oblations) in repentacne for the people's sins had to
>cease and stop. We do not have the record of what
>occured following this renting of the vail, but we
>know one thing, the sign in the temple with the rent
>vail was God's sign he was FINISHED WITH THAT HOUSE OF
>HORRORS AT THAT VERY MOMENT. Just because Pharisees
>continued in their rejection of Jesus and Calvary, did
>not make their apostate controlled system the
>continued means of God's mercy until 70AD. To even
>hint that God was using the Apostles to reach the the
>12 tribes and Gentiles with the Gospel Covenant of
>Calvary and that at the same time God was accepting
>the works of the Law for Salvation, is apostasy. Paul
>said this: "Knowing that a man is not justified by the
>works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ
>(Gal 2:16). Why would this Apostle preach this to Jew
>and Gentile and then tell them they must practice thew
>Law until the New Covanant would come at the
>"parousia" of the Lord? The Preterist heresy is not
>just a false interpretation of prophecy, it is the
>total destruction of the New Covenant faith that began
>on Calvary and is to remain until the REAL second
>advent of Jesus, the REAL "parousia".
>
>PFP Wrote: "The Law could no longer be observed, no
>longer be followed. (Something Jesus said could not
>happen until the parousia .-Matt 5:18)"
>
>Response: This is a false doctine. The Lord's Supper
>shows us when the New Testament was to be ratified and
>it was not 70AD. The rent vail in the temple shows us
>when God was finished with the Temple.
>
>PFP Wrote: " Therefore, the destruction of the Temple
>evidenced the fact that the parousia had indeed come
>to pass."
>
>Response: Another lie! Prove the physical parousia
>came in 70AD, I want to see the proof. Prove the
>destruction of the Temple was to end daily animal
>sacrifice and not the crucifixion of Jesus. So far
>there is no proof, just a lot of Preterist heresy and
>theory.
>
>PFP wrote: "The Bible, and therefore preterism,
>teaches that the time of the Temple's destruction was
>the fulfillment of �All things written (Luke
>21:20-22)."
>
>Response: Another lie on the Bible. Preterism may
>and does teach this lie, but the Word of God does not
>teach it. It must be fabricated, constructed from
>man's theories, and spiritualized in a form of
>gnosticism for it to even exist.
>
>The Preterist heresy may be accepted by many, but it
>will remain a false doctrine. It is a Catholic heresy
>that came from the gnosticism of Origin, Clement, and
>Augustine. It did not come from the Apostles.
>
>Pastor Reckart
Well spoken, Pastor!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Question #1 -- PFP, 11:40:41 10/05/02 Sat