VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45678910 ]
Subject: Curnoack


Author:
Paddy (Scotland)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:37:34 01/08/05 Sat
In reply to: Curnoack. 's message, "Not the Real Royals" on 05:44:23 01/08/05 Sat

Honestly, I do believe that you are quite insane!

"It is thought that the Queen does not herself rely on ‘bloodline legitimacy’ for her claim to be Head of State, rather she believes that she is monarch by divine right - as symbolised by her anointment with ‘holy oil’ at the 1953 coronation service."

What utter twaddle! What hellishly under-educated person wrote the above? If they stuck to the core fact instead of trying to "load" it in a particular direction using their amazingly limited skills then the point would carry itself. I found it rather an amusing tale without the unsubtle spin on it.

"We will give a warm welcome to all those who share our views and would like to join our campaign"

shows that this is a group not interested in moderate debate on the subject.

On the contrary this forum is open to debate from those who object to the idea of an FC as much as those who are passionately for it. That is why I enjoy reading and (time permitting) contributing to this forum.

However, I have to say, Curnoack, that your posts do not contribute to the debate in a well-balanced way. You post here spouting off the most ridiculous rubbish most of which is not about an FC. In fact I very much doubt your sanity and would question whether you have ever stayed in an institution.

If you have had unpleasant experiences with & an inability to fit in with "Englishmen" then I would strongly suggest that you ask yourself: why that may be? I would suggest that it is because of your deeply unpleasant character, the fact that you define your politics by being anti- the issues of others rather than pro- your own issues. Consider - all of your posts are disruptive and most are loonatic.

I am not interested in following any more of your posts and I feel that this forum would be seriously better-off without your name on it.

Good bye!

(Sorry - I cannot sign-off in Ewok.)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: Ewok?


Author:
David Hicks
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:46:25 01/08/05 Sat


"(Sorry - I cannot sign-off in Ewok.)"

Curnoack is a bit of a fruit loop but I hope that isn't a racist joke about the Cornish language...

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.