Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: UK Teams | |
Author: Dave (UK) | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 21:51:23 12/07/04 Tue In reply to: Ian (Australia) 's message, "Well, ah..." on 21:36:59 12/07/04 Tue Ian, I agree entirely with your observations on football. It is such a contrast, where in football, if a player should give so much as a cursory glance at an opposition player, they will fall like a sack of potatoes, and roll towards the touch-line as if they were on a 45 degree slope. Rugby players will only leave the field when their vision is impaired by blood-filled eyes. Yes, I’ve always been a proponent of United Kingdom sporting teams (CANZUK team aside for now). I think one of the main reason foreigners misunderstand our national composition is that we are the only country in the world that has such an inconsistent face to the world. We compete as Great Britain at the athletics and motor racing. We compete as England/Scotland/Wales/Northern Ireland at football. We compete as England/Scotland/Wales/Ireland at rugby union. We compete as Great Britain at rugby league. Of course, in the Commonwealth Games, we compete as England/Scotland/Wales/NI/IoM/Jersey/Guernsey/Rockall etc. This is farcical, and I know of no sport where we enter as the United Kingdom. There was talk of the authorities trying to form a GB football team, should London win the Olympic bid in 2012. However, this went down like a lead balloon in Scotland, causing tremors in the West-Highland fault, and people rushing to resurrect Hadrian’s Wall. People here are supposedly very proud of having their own “national” team. This is a team that is subjected to ritual humiliation every time they play. Personally, I would have more pride in being represented by one or two players in a winning team (admittedly we would not provide many at the moment), than having an entire team that serves in making the opposition look good. The same is increasingly true of rugby union too, as professionalism has destroyed the game here. As far as rugby goes, we would only lose one reasonably good team (Wales) as Ireland would continue, so I do not see competition being adversely affected. How many Ulstermen play in the united Ireland team anyway, does anyone know? This would merely reduce the number of cricket-score tallies mounted by Southern-Hemisphere teams when they tour here. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: ... | |
|
Author: Ed Harris (Venezia) [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 21:56:34 12/07/04 Tue I was thinking principally of cricket when I suggested that a CANZUK team would be mostly Australians with perhaps an English batsman. The soccer thing is the same, really. A UK team would be the English team plus Ryan Giggs. This is no ciriticism of Scottish football: perhaps if the top Scots teams were allowed to compete in the English premiership as they should (rather than just winning the Scots Premiership by a 20 point margin every year), then Scots footballers would improve. [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |