name -- FCS Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: name

Author:
Owain (UK)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:21:14 01/07/05 Fri
In reply to: Andrew(Canada) 's message, "possible names for the FC..." on 00:39:44 01/07/05 Fri

It should be a single realm I think. I think Crown Commonwealth would be fine, republicnas can always come up with ther eown name if they ever succeed in destroying our monarchy.

I like Crown Commonwleath becuase it isnt hurrendously long and encourages monarchism. The full name would of course be the Crown Commonwealth of etc etc.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Name of FC
Author: Jim (Canada) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:12:53 01/07/05 Fri Federation of United Commonwealth Kingdoms - good idea, but the acronym spells F.U.C.K. - not a good idea at all! I favour the United Kingdoms of the Commonwealth - the UKC. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> Subject: That is, of course, precisely why the joke was made, Jim
Author: Ian (ironyland) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:40:38 01/07/05 Fri [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: ...

Author:
Ed Harris (London)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:38:25 01/07/05 Fri

I was going to suggest Federal Commonwealth of United Kingdoms, but then we'd be sued by the clothing company.

Reminds me of a debate which we had at Party Conference in 1997 when we were thinking of a new name for the Young Conservatives, and eventually decided on the ineffably naff 'Conservative Futures'. I suggested at the time that Future Conservatives United Kingdom would be the most eye-catching in terms of acromymns, but was over-ruled by a lot of young fogeys who think that politics should not be funny.

My other half also once suggested to an Amnesty International beatnik at university - all magic beads and dreadlocks - who was trying to raise money for 'political prisoners' at Guantanamo and elsewhere, that she should establish the "Campaign for Liberation and Integration of Terrorist Organisations and their Rehabilitation Into Society". This, unsurprisingly, was also rejected out of hand. Shame, as they could have printed the most eye-catching t-shirts.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]