VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Oracle, PeopleSoft prepared for midnight offer deadline


Author:
Oracle-god
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:31:11 11/19/04 Fri

Oracle, PeopleSoft prepared for midnight offer deadline
Oracle plans to release the results early tomorrow



Video: Decreasing the time, cost, risk associated with business integration - Gartner analysts describe the benefits and the pitfalls of application integration


News Story by Stacy Cowley

NOVEMBER 19, 2004 (IDG NEWS SERVICE) - The midnight expiration of Oracle Corp.'s tender offer to PeopleSoft Inc.'s shareholders for control of the company will either end the software rivals' bitter, 17-month battle tonight -- or increase its ferocity.

Oracle said it will release the results of the offer as soon as feasible after 1 a.m. tomorrow EST, an hour after the deadline for what it said will be its final offer. If a majority of PeopleSoft shares aren't tendered to Oracle for the $24 per share it has bid, Oracle plans to walk away from its takeover campaign. If it does receive the majority of PeopleSoft's shares, Oracle said it will treat that as a mandate from PeopleSoft's shareholders to continue pressing for a $9.2 billion buyout of PeopleSoft, against the wishes of PeopleSoft's directors.

Financial analysts are split in their opinions about Oracle's chance of success. PeopleSoft had a head start in keeping itself out of Oracle's hands: About 20% of its shares are owned by insiders or large institutional investors that don't plan to tender their shares. However, Oracle's bid is generally regarded as having lifted PeopleSoft's shares higher than they would otherwise trade for. Investors interested in seeing the bid continue are likely to accept the tender.

If Oracle's 50% support benchmark is met, it still faces a daunting obstacle: the opposition of PeopleSoft's board, which can take advantage of provisions in PeopleSoft's bylaws and the laws of Delaware (the company's state of incorporation) to block a hostile acquisition. The two companies last month concluded a trial in Delaware's Chancery Court, which Oracle has asked to invalidate PeopleSoft's antitakeover protections. Oracle and PeopleSoft will meet on Wednesday for a hearing on that case with the presiding judge, who is still preparing his decision.

PeopleSoft is already trying to limit the damage that would be done if it can't muster the support of a shareholder majority. Company presidents Kevin Parker and Phil Wilmington sent a letter to PeopleSoft employees on Wednesday advising them not to be surprised if Oracle receives more than 50% of PeopleSoft's shares in its tender offer.

"We know that stockholders may tender for a variety of reasons," they wrote. "The intense media coverage of Oracle's offer will continue for the next several weeks, but we can't be distracted."

If Oracle cannot persuade the Delaware court to strip PeopleSoft's antitakeover protections, its next option would be a proxy contest at PeopleSoft's 2005 annual meeting to replace PeopleSoft's incumbent directors with board members of its own choosing.

PeopleSoft has staggered terms for its board members, but the company's firing of former CEO Craig Conway and subsequent reduction in its board size from eight members to seven leaves it with four directors, a majority, up for re-election in 2005.

http://www3.addfreestats.com/cgi-bin/showuni3.cgi

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.