VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wed, Jan 07 2004, 0:55:28 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19/07/15 22:38:24
Author: Walter Sanson
Subject: Re: vulcan accident
In reply to: B. Valentine 's message, "vulcan accident" on 28/02/04 15:13:12

I was flying with 199 Sqdn. at Hemswell on the day the Vulcan crashed at Heathrow. There was a feeling of total shock when we got the news and could not understand why S/Ldr Howard failed to divert when he was ordered to do so due to the weather at Heathrow. The gossip was that he had been over-ridden but what really took place we'll never know

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: vulcan accident -- Maurice Hamlin, 23/09/15 11:01:56

Dear Readers
The true reason for the Crash of Vulcan XA897 on 1st Oct 1956.
Despite my having emailed every MP and 250 members of the House of Lords details of why A.V.M Broadhurst refused to divert Vulcan XA897 from landing at London Airport. Not one of those MPs'queried the truth of my statement. The only response I received from many of these MPs was - that as I was not one of there particular constituents they were not allowed to respond. Manslaughter is not urgent enough to upset the rules.

The message is - Make sure you are properly registered with your Local MP or he has No Interest in you whatever.
I had the mistaken idea that they were voted in as the publics' servants Maurice 23rd September 2015

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]


[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  E-mail address (required):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.