VoyForums: ERG trade data forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

ERG Calendar

Perth tender lodged 29/11/02 being evaluated 30/1/03

ACTION/EVENT INDICATIVE DATE* Meeting of Noteholders 10.30am 28 March 2003 Adjourned meeting of Noteholders (if required) 10.30am 16 April 2003 Shareholder proxy form due at Computershare 10.30am 28 April 2003 Meeting of Shareholders 10.30am 30 April 2003 Announcement of proposed Note Conversion Date 30 April 2003 Cessation of Note trading at close of business on ASX 9 May 2003 Announcement of Rights Issue timetable ** 9 May 2003 Commencement of trading of new Shares on ASX (deferred delivery) 12 May 2003 Record date for conversion of Notes to Shares 5.00pm Sydney time 16 May 2003 Last date for issue of Shares on conversion of Notes 23 May 2003

The Future lnterest Conversion will only apply if the Listed Note Conversion or the Proposed Capital -- Restructure does not proceed,
The April Interest Capitalisation will have effect on and from l April 2003 -- Deed and Conditions set out in this clause 3 will have no force or effect if thisÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ deed is not executed before 21 April 2003. http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2003/01/27/story6.html

From the January 24, 2003 print edition

The TransLink system functions, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission has determined after a six-month test run that concluded Jan. 15.2003The 26 Bay Area transit districts that funded the test are to decide by March if and how they will become involved in a fully operational TransLink system, says Russell Driver, the commission's TransLink project director.

NSW State Election - Saturday,22 March 2003.Triple witch 21/3/2003 U.S. time. American tax year April 15 Stockholm due (San Fran phase 2) (San Fran between March and May--source 233 page report Ernst and Young.233 ERNST and YOUNG PDF

Last of the transit operators to say yes re Washington and Seattle due. Sale of Proton by end of March--Net assets rises to 10.3 based on accounts as they stood 31/12/2002 (as at)Net tangible assets for end 31/12/02 is 7.1981023892813.If Proton had been sold before 31/12/02--Sabre-Egoli--source Patterson Ord Minnett.NTA-8.5----assets11.6 Net assets are 11.6 233 page report Ernst and Young--the newspaper states 11 SMH 16/5/03---NTA was 7.198 it should now be 8.5--31/5/03

ÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ

Integrated Fare Management System for Bordeaux fully integrated global platform -- PARIS, March 22,2001second phase completed by March 2003.

Standard and Poors due to adjust Australian Pacific weightings 1st business day in April--should appear on website approx 2 weeks before--source telephone call to them.MTE study in relation to Toronto started 8/6/02 was expected to conclude Dec 02.(Canada) from which a decision on whether to proceed to phase 2 is made.

order-dexedr --

billy, 04:47:46 03/15/23 Wed [1]

Bevelen Fentanyl Acetyl --

macbushner, 06:15:44 11/29/21 Mon [1]

Order Greenstone Xanax online without prescription in USA --

macbushner, 15:33:59 11/23/21 Tue [1]

Cannabis for sales online --

XANAXLORD1900 (Buy marijuana, online Texas), 18:04:43 11/17/21 Wed [1]

Vapes juice online --

XANAXLORD1900 (Vapes cartridge online sales), 18:03:53 11/17/21 Wed [1]

High quality marijuana --

XANAXLORD1900 (Weed online for sales), 18:03:06 11/17/21 Wed [1]

OG kush for sales online --

XANAXLORD1900 (OG kush for sales online), 18:02:28 11/17/21 Wed [1]

buy oxycodone online - oxycodone for sale -buy xanax --

williambobson (wickr....williamroland), 23:55:31 07/01/21 Thu [1]

xanax --

williamjac (+1(510)379-9187), 13:47:39 06/29/21 Tue [1]

alprazolam for sale --

williamjac (5103799187 GOOD QUALITY PILLS), 08:39:57 06/29/21 Tue [1]

Management Stoner Freeman Gilbert Free Download Zip -- denraysh, 07:55:04 03/31/14 Mon [1]

Embedded Microcomputer Systems: Real Time Interfacing, Second Edition.pdf -- trevcat, 06:33:27 03/31/14 Mon [1]

Evermotion Archshaders Vol 3 Vray -- trevcat, 06:32:29 03/31/14 Mon [1]

Download Analysis Of Transport Phenomena Deen Solution Rar -- trevcat, 06:31:56 03/31/14 Mon [1]

Free Download Tildes Birojs 2011 -- trevcat, 06:30:41 03/31/14 Mon [1]

Free Download Tildes Birojs 2011 -- trevcat, 16:38:41 03/30/14 Sun [1]

Vsco Film Pack 01 Download -- trevcat, 16:37:20 03/30/14 Sun [1]

IPhone Bibel Herbst Winter No 01 2012 | Added By Request -- walbeth, 17:11:43 03/28/14 Fri [1]

TeamViewer 3.0 Free | Temp -- walbeth, 17:10:09 03/28/14 Fri [1]

The Hindu Woman (Teachers College Studies In Education) -- anchscanl, 22:46:42 03/19/14 Wed [1]

Passage To Freedom -- anchscanl, 22:45:39 03/19/14 Wed [1]

Thankyou Egoli you are a good site -- Name: Wonder Woman, 18:04:10 02/19/03 Wed [2]

or do from 13.2 with 5.1 as a base 61.8% equalling 40.54698 (NT) -- 13.2 minus 40.54698 equals 8.65302, 05:47:06 03/10/03 Mon [2]

Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 07:08 am -- stockmarket.file numberASIC 70034133, 12:34:15 07/06/03 Sun [1]

ERG (NT) -- understood, 17:42:10 04/15/03 Tue [4]

26-03-2003 07:03pm26-03-2003 06:40pm 26-03-2003 06:35pm26-03-2003 06:32pm -- No name, 13:58:13 03/26/03 Wed [1]

we have agreed terms that preserve and even enhance the -- net asset backing of your shareholding., 13:55:45 03/26/03 Wed [1]

Trade data -- Last 9.9 vwap 9.91-vol=5,475,055 25/3/03, 02:30:04 03/25/03 Tue [1]

Youve got Seattle signing by end April -- then 50 mill hitting financing investing activities early May, 09:45:11 03/24/03 Mon [1]

Egoli don't have a problem with publishing ERGs NTA of 10.3c (NT) -- Stockhouse has a problem with it----Steve., 07:10:53 03/24/03 Mon [1]

Based on account position 31/12/02 Patterson Ord Minnet state (NT) -- with the sale of Proton NTA is 10.3c (not allowed to say it at Stockhouse), 07:05:35 03/24/03 Mon [1]

Barry Pittman posting as salus fraudulently using BB's again -- ERG calendar and other details deleted Stockhouse, 07:03:15 03/24/03 Mon [1]

Myself I think everybody would prefer a delusional bonkers (NT) -- rather than one that concentrates on reality (lol), 06:02:45 03/20/03 Thu [1]

Last trades 8.4 vwap 8.5 12/3/03 -- vol==equals-10,094,738, 06:54:22 03/12/03 Wed [1]

Value/consideration 200,304.56 ---equals 1.51.7458 per share -- Number Acquired 132,000Date of change 06/03/2003, 06:47:38 03/12/03 Wed [1]

CPU----13/3/03--Mellon starting Oz -- 187 4:40:37 pm 135 26,000,000 14 $35,100,000 1 , 06:40:20 03/12/03 Wed [2]

toss it mate with the manipulative ego praise--you want me to read a 233 page report on your behalf (NT) -- you sling a couple of thousand into my bank account., 06:37:00 03/12/03 Wed [1]

Noted are your phone convo's--why are you asking me the share prices for then? then saying something else on the BB? (NT) -- Hi Walt yes I'm a loser and a tosser--weird stuff., 06:35:18 03/12/03 Wed [1]

I sense a big insto may have dumped cause an awful lot were taken out quick time in one hit (NT) -- some one sold a lot in a hurry., 01:51:12 03/10/03 Mon [2]

I don't think at present levels someone should necessarily sell either (NT) -- for the analysis is the bottom would be 8 to 9---today the low already went to 9.7, 06:20:51 03/10/03 Mon [2]

Subject: Hi Erg,- NTA forward projection 1st half accounts-estimated 22.41c. -- Name: Wonder Woman, 11:36:27 03/10/03 Mon [2]

Egoli at the 9c level are allowing fairly just simple and dumb posts to go through but anything more sophisticated -- is declined on the 11/3/03, 17:25:10 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Michael I rish is right---for instance it is a clear buy at present levels with a time view (NT) -- with proper observance of risk capital etc--it might go down still---but not much in it., 11:12:49 03/10/03 Mon [1]

No I would say Hahaha would be realistic about the short term trend--but he is definitely aware of the value behind the stock Walt (NT) -- it is a rush to cover on improved financials--it is nothing less than that--Cheers,--Steve, 11:09:20 03/10/03 Mon [1]

I don't think at present levels someone should necessarily sell either (NT) -- for the analysis is the bottom would be 8 to 9---today the low already went to 9.7, 06:19:48 03/10/03 Mon [1]

The thing is you only turn your puter on once a week so they have a little difficulty doing that with you (NT) -- No name, 06:17:27 03/10/03 Mon [1]

depends who knows he could be right and it could hold 10--I don't really think so (NT) -- unless some positives come along--I don't mind being proven wrong, 06:15:56 03/10/03 Mon [1]

The present trend is okay to accumulate in my view little by little (NT) -- but it definitely on the extreme short as a buy is pretty ugly--untill it settles down, 06:12:59 03/10/03 Mon [1]

I think he is bulltwanging you Walt--I see 8 to 9c--now I didn't before then possibly going to 12 -- he's setting you for a dependency situation--t should hold around pwi nta, 06:11:24 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Yes you may not do fundamentals Brumbie the horse but I'm sure you do arbitrage (NT) -- if you looked at it 13.2 minus 5.1--equals 8.1--thats one way of doing it--or a retracement from 10 using 5.1 as a base, 05:42:15 03/10/03 Mon [1]

The reality of BB's are though Egoli--WW is not a threat to you with a 30c ERG--or a 20c ERG or a 15c ERG or even maybe a 10c ERG unless it is before Sydney (NT) -- WW though is a definite ban job at between 5 and 10 isn't she--60% lend--she sure is., 05:36:30 03/10/03 Mon [1]

U.S. FUTURES & MARKETS INDICATORS -- oz night 10/3, 05:33:04 03/10/03 Mon [1]

But then the reason to buy when the share price goes down is the correct view not based on sentiment (NT) -- but the truth--which is my view---Cheers,---Steve, 05:21:12 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Yes Walt if it is your view PWI is unsuccesful--it is not my view--but your view in terms of sentiment share trading is correct (NT) -- Proton has been very succesful--quite the opposite from what your saying--but to make money (ie sentiment) is correct., 05:19:21 03/10/03 Mon [1]

incorect amortisation depreciation all up including PWI for 2002 year 46 million--i see okay--so then we subtract 15 mill off that--it gets rid of a net 4 million--but because theyve tanngibilised Proton -- they have definitely made the 40.9 million something that which ERG can earn in the future that is tangible without dispute, 05:16:25 03/10/03 Mon [1]

In my view Peter Fogarty hasn't been a bad business manager---he is a victim of Australia's (NT) -- accontancy regime--basically everything that is being done--is to get around that, 05:06:20 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Just while we are at it Brumbie the horse--this may help on the fundamentals I know you only do charting$38.2 million in 2002 minus 15 million equals 23.2 million in this finncial year, it is a non cash expense but it is charged to the bottom line so this improves profatibility -- ERG have lopped off 15 million in armortisation by flogging off Proton, 05:03:32 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Incorrect again--the 46 million is from the 02 year---let me check that (NT) -- tired.--this will be a goodun if I get this, 04:58:06 03/10/03 Mon [1]

wrong wrong wrong--the 46 million and the extra payment were made a provision and will be there for the whole year (NT) -- ERG have though with the extra dough wiped out some loans (when this occurs) and linked it ti the earn out payment of 40.9 mil also 60 mill in cash left overl, 04:55:28 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Hi Brumbie the horse--Wonder Woman here---you only do charting--it helps to know though that on fundamentals I believe the share price will be higher than 10 by June 30th 2003 (NT) -- doesn't it?, 04:51:31 03/10/03 Mon [1]

You can't go any lower than zero--so the maximum ERG could charge next time at 445.000 a cent would be (NT) -- 4.45 million., 04:36:45 03/10/03 Mon [1]

One of the very reasons ofcourse that the share price is likely to be higher than 10 come June 30th 2003--is ofcourse (NT) -- the very fact 46 million woont be charged to the bottom line., 04:34:50 03/10/03 Mon [1]

By June 30th 2003--the company will be if it runs to schedule totally reconstructed--the share price is likely to be higher than 10 (NT) -- No name, 04:31:29 03/10/03 Mon [1]

But if the share price was 8c by June 30th 2003 and ERG had to charge an extra 890.000 to the bottom line that perhaps wouldn't be a big thing as previous to that the fall from 30 down to 10 has already been charged which is 46 million dollars (NT) -- so the 46 million that won't be charged next time--more than outweighs the 890.000 if 8c by June 30th 2003 was the scenario, 04:29:30 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Yes a fall below ten would be a real methadone job--ERG would then have to charge an extra 890.000 to the bottom line for this half--that would be the case if it occurred I would think exactly on June 30th 2003--I'm not completely sure on that (NT) -- but I think so--so in other words---by June 2003--it is in ERGs interest to have a share price (apart from other things) (on this matter) above 10 at least., 04:25:15 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Why don't you just use plain ordinary language and say Hi WW I think the bottom for ERG stock is 8c -- here are the reasons why I think that?----Regards,--Steve, 04:18:48 03/10/03 Mon [1]

No the problem is Walt you don't read not only me but others as well--no one I ever speak to on the phone does with BB's (NT) -- you only have to go to the ERG thread at stockhouse to see the hints dating back 6 months--"wait till the fog clears?" are you thick or something?, 03:37:31 03/10/03 Mon [1]

And further if Peter Fogarty is getting asked to leave--the downward rush is definitely (NT) -- short covering isn't it?---LOL, 03:34:55 03/10/03 Mon [1]

And I believe I have a very valuable correct point of view (NT) -- despite censorship by Egoli., 03:31:05 03/10/03 Mon [1]

I see at whatever the bottom for the share price is---that whoever gets it will be with a six month view getting a good company (NT) -- that has vastly improved itself and will be even better in six months--and you only see that every now and then on the stockmarket, 03:29:34 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Oh I see it is a sensitive time in the share price?--I had no idea--I do fundamentals (NT) -- I see a great company with a six month view, 03:27:47 03/10/03 Mon [1]

I tried to reply to you Brumbie and Sabre today for some reason my posts wouldn't go through.If I have offended anyone here, please let me know.All the bestRegards,--WW., -- Name: Wonder WomanMonday, March 10, 03:21:30 03/10/03 Mon [1]

37% of 13.59 equals 50283--13.59 minus 50283 equals 8.5617 (NT) -- No name, 02:18:41 03/10/03 Mon [1]

that dated the 6th out of the 233 page proposal--anyway all the best (NT) -- No name, 02:12:34 03/10/03 Mon [1]

We present to you a proposal to reconstruct the capital and debt ofERG Limited (ERG or the Company), -- 6.38pm, 02:06:09 03/10/03 Mon [1]

youve come in now to scramble brains now have you?--diverge the conversation -- I can't reply anyway as stated either theyve instituted a temporary posting ban (NT) -- or as I state Ive done my dash at yet another website, 01:54:44 03/10/03 Mon [1]

I have replied to you today Sabre--I think Ive scored a hatrick Egoli may have banned me--not that I'm relying on that as a buy signal for ERG (NT) -- sharetrend looks like 8 or 9 to me-only talking in extremes medium to longer term fine.--touch and go--regards,--WW., 01:46:19 03/10/03 Mon [1]

Yes with the sale of Proton ERG gets rid of some research and development costs that will be removed from the bottom line -- and wilkl no longer impact profadapoondo, 01:43:08 03/10/03 Mon [1]

I'd still see him with some sort of role in the company though for he is a great euntrepeneur and salesperson (NT) -- you need that to win contracts., 01:13:18 03/10/03 Mon [1]

It is a fact that a condition of the recapatilisation proposal is that the board be reduced from 6 down to 5 (NT) -- 233 page report dated the 6/3/03--Ernst and Young, 01:09:02 03/10/03 Mon [1]

You can see Babacock has paid the journos to do the softening up over the last year or so (NT) -- can't you?--at least I can., 01:07:12 03/10/03 Mon [1]

It is not what I think of Peter Fogarty--the decision is not mine to make--if you are asking me personally? I think he has done a great job for ERG--my judgement though is -- it would make the share price bullish if he were to go--even though that is the market and not me personally, 01:04:13 03/10/03 Mon [1]

youve come in now to scramble brains now have you?--diverge the conversation -- no thankyou.--seeing you don't do fundamentals you won't be interested in ERG's nta with the sale of Proton will you?, 00:28:10 03/10/03 Mon [1]

reconstruction proceeding along the lines of 233 page report many of you have had prior to release -- by about 3 months---cheers,---Steve, 07:40:24 03/09/03 Sun [1]

U.S. FUTURES & MARKETS INDICATORS -- oz morning 10/3, 07:26:07 03/09/03 Sun [1]

Yorkshire and HumbersideFirstcard Bradford (pioneering new technology) -- First big public transport smartcard scheme in UK: attracting new users to the bus, 06:52:29 03/09/03 Sun [1]

[ Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]