VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:54:52 May 17 2003, Saturday
Author: Mike
Subject: Re: The Law Of Fives
In reply to: Maryna 's message, "Re: The Law Of Fives" on 19:54:36 May 16 2003, Friday

>>>http://www.samkass.com/theories/RPSSL.html
>>>
>>>To all you seven lovers out there, eat a new game,
>>>conformable with the all powerful Law Of Fives.
>>>
>>>It looks like a wonderful game!
>>
>>The conclusion that factitious and I came to (or, to
>>be specific, I came to, and he didn't complain much)
>>is that 7 is a good number for me, for many, many
>>reasons, while 5 is a good number for, say, him. Any
>>competition for which number is better is merely in
>>the spirit of fun.
>>
>>That being said, what did I do to warrant such
>>antagonism? I will most certainly NOT "eat" this new
>>game. I prefer edible food. And who are you, anyway?
>
>Yeah, who the hell are you?

Well? Are you gonna reply?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Eric the author of all, 02:28:06 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>>>http://www.samkass.com/theories/RPSSL.html
>>>>
>>>>To all you seven lovers out there, eat a new game,
>>>>conformable with the all powerful Law Of Fives.
>>>>
>>>>It looks like a wonderful game!
>>>
>>>The conclusion that factitious and I came to (or, to
>>>be specific, I came to, and he didn't complain much)
>>>is that 7 is a good number for me, for many, many
>>>reasons, while 5 is a good number for, say, him. Any
>>>competition for which number is better is merely in
>>>the spirit of fun.
>>>
>>>That being said, what did I do to warrant such
>>>antagonism? I will most certainly NOT "eat" this new
>>>game. I prefer edible food. And who are you, anyway?
>>
>>Yeah, who the hell are you?
>
>Well? Are you gonna reply?

well of course it was me who put up taht link...because im always doing things like that HA HA, yes all credit does go to me and me alone, and if anyone says otherwise they are most likely not telling the truth


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Not Eric, 12:45:30 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>>>>http://www.samkass.com/theories/RPSSL.html
>>>>>
>>>>>To all you seven lovers out there, eat a new game,
>>>>>conformable with the all powerful Law Of Fives.
>>>>>
>>>>>It looks like a wonderful game!
>>>>
>>>>The conclusion that factitious and I came to (or, to
>>>>be specific, I came to, and he didn't complain much)
>>>>is that 7 is a good number for me, for many, many
>>>>reasons, while 5 is a good number for, say, him. Any
>>>>competition for which number is better is merely in
>>>>the spirit of fun.
>>>>
>>>>That being said, what did I do to warrant such
>>>>antagonism? I will most certainly NOT "eat" this new
>>>>game. I prefer edible food. And who are you, anyway?
>>>
>>>Yeah, who the hell are you?
>>
>>Well? Are you gonna reply?
>
>well of course it was me who put up taht
>link...because im always doing things like that HA HA,
>yes all credit does go to me and me alone, and if
>anyone says otherwise they are most likely not telling
>the truth


I bet you would like to think that you put up that link. BUT NAY. You are a knave for believing such lies! For it was I, the Five Avenger why put up the link. For that is my purpose! Do not believe this "Eric" person who lieth!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Maryna, 16:28:52 May 18 2003, Sunday

>I bet you would like to think that you put up that
>link. BUT NAY. You are a knave for believing such
>lies! For it was I, the Five Avenger why put up the
>link. For that is my purpose! Do not believe this
>"Eric" person who lieth!

The only one who would say "lieth" is Albert...


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- not albert either, 16:48:08 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>I bet you would like to think that you put up that
>>link. BUT NAY. You are a knave for believing such
>>lies! For it was I, the Five Avenger why put up the
>>link. For that is my purpose! Do not believe this
>>"Eric" person who lieth!
>
>The only one who would say "lieth" is Albert...

or is he?


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 17:11:41 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>The only one who would say "lieth" is Albert...
>
>or is he?

Yeah, he is. I'm thinking that this is Albert's evil twin, Bertal!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Nope!, 17:18:27 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>>The only one who would say "lieth" is Albert...
>>
>>or is he?
>
>Yeah, he is. I'm thinking that this is Albert's evil
>twin, Bertal!

Bertal?? I would not stoop to such a name! NAY, for my name is glorious and beyond your comprehension! Glory to me and curses on all of you! ::Insert maniacle laughter::


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 18:18:01 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>>>The only one who would say "lieth" is Albert...
>>>
>>>or is he?
>>
>>Yeah, he is. I'm thinking that this is Albert's evil
>>twin, Bertal!
>
>Bertal?? I would not stoop to such a name! NAY, for
>my name is glorious and beyond your comprehension!
>Glory to me and curses on all of you! ::Insert
>maniacle laughter::

Well, you're not Fabrice, because he is not online as often as it would take for you to respond so quickly. And I doubt that you are LN, because she would just hack into the site and make it announce her presence. I must therefore assume that you are someone that Ben knows from Rochester, probably Nat. That would also explain your knowledge of the Law Of Fives, and my own peculiar taste regarding the #7, since that really only comes up when me and Ben are together.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- SHAME, 18:25:26 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>>>>The only one who would say "lieth" is Albert...
>>>>
>>>>or is he?
>>>
>>>Yeah, he is. I'm thinking that this is Albert's evil
>>>twin, Bertal!
>>
>>Bertal?? I would not stoop to such a name! NAY, for
>>my name is glorious and beyond your comprehension!
>>Glory to me and curses on all of you! ::Insert
>>maniacle laughter::
>
>Well, you're not Fabrice, because he is not online as
>often as it would take for you to respond so quickly.
>And I doubt that you are LN, because she would just
>hack into the site and make it announce her presence.
>I must therefore assume that you are someone that Ben
>knows from Rochester, probably Nat. That would also
>explain your knowledge of the Law Of Fives, and my own
>peculiar taste regarding the #7, since that really
>only comes up when me and Ben are together.

ANOTHER incorrect guess. My how SAD this is. FOR I am NOT this NAT person. NAY! Nor am I LN. You have shamed yourselves! ::insert more laughter::


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 21:20:06 May 18 2003, Sunday

>ANOTHER incorrect guess. My how SAD this is. FOR I
>am NOT this NAT person. NAY! Nor am I LN. You have
>shamed yourselves! ::insert more laughter::

What I think is SAD is PEOPLE who abuse CAPS and refuse TO reVEal their iDenTitIes to the lOyaL pEoPle OF this fOruM. BeLiEvE iT oR nOt, It GeTs OlD rEaLlY fAsT. tHe CaPs AND tHe RiDiCuLoUs AtTeMpT At sECreCy. RiDdiKulus, bEcAuse aT soME poiNT, wE sTop cArINg enOUgh To guesS wHo YoU aRe, and beGin wiShing yOU wOulD shUt ThE fUCk uP.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Maryna, 22:08:53 May 18 2003, Sunday

>>ANOTHER incorrect guess. My how SAD this is. FOR I
>>am NOT this NAT person. NAY! Nor am I LN. You have
>>shamed yourselves! ::insert more laughter::
>
>What I think is SAD is PEOPLE who abuse CAPS and
>refuse TO reVEal their iDenTitIes to the lOyaL pEoPle
>OF this fOruM. BeLiEvE iT oR nOt, It GeTs OlD rEaLlY
>fAsT. tHe CaPs AND tHe RiDiCuLoUs AtTeMpT At sECreCy.
>RiDdiKulus, bEcAuse aT soME poiNT, wE sTop cArINg
>enOUgh To guesS wHo YoU aRe, and beGin wiShing yOU
>wOulD shUt ThE fUCk uP.

What's an LN?


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 23:14:56 May 18 2003, Sunday

>What's an LN?

LN is the abbrevtiation of Helene, a friend of me, Ben, and Albert (among others). Her name is most accurately pronounced "Ell-enn"(or something), so we like to spell her name LN.

She's French-Canadian, and tries to tell us that it should be spelled colour and theatre, but she's a neat person. One of the biggest computer nerds I know. Her blanket has the word "blanket" spelled in binary on it.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- boku, 17:06:39 May 19 2003, Monday

>>ANOTHER incorrect guess. My how SAD this is. FOR I
>>am NOT this NAT person. NAY! Nor am I LN. You have
>>shamed yourselves! ::insert more laughter::
>
>What I think is SAD is PEOPLE who abuse CAPS and
>refuse TO reVEal their iDenTitIes to the lOyaL pEoPle
>OF this fOruM. BeLiEvE iT oR nOt, It GeTs OlD rEaLlY
>fAsT. tHe CaPs AND tHe RiDiCuLoUs AtTeMpT At sECreCy.
>RiDdiKulus, bEcAuse aT soME poiNT, wE sTop cArINg
>enOUgh To guesS wHo YoU aRe, and beGin wiShing yOU
>wOulD shUt ThE fUCk uP.


My, my, my. Aren't we the angry one! Well, I may use capitals in amusing locations, but at least I spell properly! Strange, because you spelled ridiculus properly the first time... Besides Mike, I'm sure you figure out who this is. I know you are smart. And Maryna, you are an interesting person! Right then. Moving on.

This has been fun. Yet, this shall the last of my posts in this subject. I knew the Law of 5 would spark something, and it has been good! Surprising. BTW, Maryna, Albert is not the only person who would say "lieth." You just don't know me yet! However, if you want to harass / get to know me, I am sure Mike can hook you up.

I hope you all have a nice day.

ja ne.

-me


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 17:42:19 May 19 2003, Monday

>My, my, my. Aren't we the angry one! Well, I may use
>capitals in amusing locations, but at least I spell
>properly! Strange, because you spelled ridiculus
>properly the first time... Besides Mike, I'm sure you
>figure out who this is. I know you are smart. And
>Maryna, you are an interesting person! Right then.
>Moving on.
>
>This has been fun. Yet, this shall the last of my
>posts in this subject. I knew the Law of 5 would
>spark something, and it has been good! Surprising.
>BTW, Maryna, Albert is not the only person who would
>say "lieth." You just don't know me yet! However, if
>you want to harass / get to know me, I am sure Mike
>can hook you up.
>
>I hope you all have a nice day.
>
>ja ne.
>
>-me

Riddikulus is a Harry Potter reference. From the 4th book, he uses it on the boggart. I threw it in there because I am a nerd. I'm surprised that as someone who claims to know me, you didn't figure it out immeditately.

And now I feel like a loser for not having instantly figured out who you are. It is topped only by the losery feeling I have from not knowing right now. I'll think about it, though.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Expecto Patronum, 17:55:16 May 19 2003, Monday

>>My, my, my. Aren't we the angry one! Well, I may use
>>capitals in amusing locations, but at least I spell
>>properly! Strange, because you spelled ridiculus
>>properly the first time... Besides Mike, I'm sure you
>>figure out who this is. I know you are smart. And
>>Maryna, you are an interesting person! Right then.
>>Moving on.
>>
>>This has been fun. Yet, this shall the last of my
>>posts in this subject. I knew the Law of 5 would
>>spark something, and it has been good! Surprising.
>>BTW, Maryna, Albert is not the only person who would
>>say "lieth." You just don't know me yet! However, if
>>you want to harass / get to know me, I am sure Mike
>>can hook you up.
>>
>>I hope you all have a nice day.
>>
>>ja ne.
>>
>>-me
>
>Riddikulus is a Harry Potter reference. From the 4th
>book, he uses it on the boggart. I threw it in there
>because I am a nerd. I'm surprised that as someone who
>claims to know me, you didn't figure it out
>immeditately.
>
>And now I feel like a loser for not having instantly
>figured out who you are. It is topped only by the
>losery feeling I have from not knowing right now. I'll
>think about it, though.

Well, I hate to be a hypocrite, but I suppose I will make one last post here to clear up something. Riddikulus is a spell one uses change a boggart from one's worst fear into a way of making fun of that fear (eg. Snape into Snape wearing a pink dress). If one can make fun of a fear, one can overcome it. Last time I checked, I am not your worst fear, nor did your spell actually do anything. (As much as you love magic, it don't exist. Sad, I know) Oh, and the reason I didn't get the reference was because I have not read Book 4 in quite some time. That is all!

-Not a Dementor


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 20:16:14 May 19 2003, Monday

>Well, I hate to be a hypocrite, but I suppose I will
>make one last post here to clear up something.
>Riddikulus is a spell one uses change a boggart from
>one's worst fear into a way of making fun of that fear
>(eg. Snape into Snape wearing a pink dress). If one
>can make fun of a fear, one can overcome it. Last
>time I checked, I am not your worst fear, nor did your
>spell actually do anything. (As much as you love
>magic, it don't exist. Sad, I know) Oh, and the
>reason I didn't get the reference was because I have
>not read Book 4 in quite some time. That is all!
>
>-Not a Dementor

Very good. And no, I didn't mean to imply that you are my worst fear. I merely threw it in because I noticed myself using the word ridiculous twice in a row. Nothing deeper than that.

I'm gonna start a new thread, in which I try to guess who you are. At some point, I'm just going to go through the list of friends that I have, because I'm tired of slowly gathering evidence.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: The Law Of Fives -- Mike, 20:18:49 May 19 2003, Monday

Very nice. I threw the reference in there because I noticed myself using the word ridiculous twice in a row, and because I am (as you very well know) a nerd.

At this point, I'm just gonna start guessing, and consequences be damned if it takes me a million years! See new thread for details.


[ Edit | View ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.