Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

[ Edit | View ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: More content~! -- Mike, 02:21:32 June 13 2003, Friday

>I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?

Yes, but it doesn't.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: More content~! -- Albert, 04:49:28 June 13 2003, Friday

>>I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?
>
>Yes, but it doesn't.

See, that's what I'm talking about when I complain about the lack of punctuation. Two simple keystrokes would have been enough to make the meaning of the statement totally clear. Observe:

The original:
bens hair sexy nooooo
With question mark:
bens hair sexy? nooooo

There are still a few things wrong with it, but at least it actually communicates something.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: More content~! -- Factitious, 05:50:24 June 13 2003, Friday

>>>I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?
>>
>>Yes, but it doesn't.
>
>See, that's what I'm talking about when I complain
>about the lack of punctuation. Two simple keystrokes
>would have been enough to make the meaning of the
>statement totally clear. Observe:
>
>The original:
>bens hair sexy nooooo
>With question mark:
>bens hair sexy? nooooo
>
>There are still a few things wrong with it, but at
>least it actually communicates something.

Ben's hair: sexy. Nooooo?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: More content~! -- Maryna, 13:32:58 June 13 2003, Friday


>Ben's hair: sexy. Nooooo?

Ben's hair: sexy. No? Oooo.

Eric, congratulations... in the future we have to avoid giving Ben the opportunity to twist our words to feed his own insatiable ego (he doesn't know yet that we're in cahoots)!

[ Edit | View ]