VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:02:16 April 17 2003, Thursday
Author: Albert
Subject: Re: Three, each having one and only one of the truth values "true" and "false"
In reply to: Factitious 's message, "Three, each having one and only one of the truth values "true" and "false"" on 15:54:42 April 17 2003, Thursday

>Bah! Why not take that idea further? Three
>statements, each of which may be true or false, in any
>combination? This way, there are 8 possibilites, as
>opposed to the 6 allowable in your proposal.

But the point of both of the original variants and my proposed extension is to identify the one which does not match the others. This gameplay concept does not scale to your idea.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.