VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:33:29 06/01/04 Tue
Author: 方包
Subject: RE:旺財/////你話靚蝦王好過電子麒麟既所謂證據只係麒麟還未到馬王級top form既麒麟,你又可以證明top form0既靚蝦王好過top form0既麒麟咩?? 如果單憑你果d隔山打牛式o既秤馬方法就可以証明蝦王高過麒麟的話,我都可以証明麒麟高過蝦王啦!你鍾意隔幾座山去秤馬o下嘛?咁我就用番個你認為可行的方法去証明囉!


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.