VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:26:02 06/08/04 Tue
Author: 方包
Subject: 請問我講左邊句令你覺得我D言論無根據??唔好淨係UP先得架!!
In reply to: 方包 's message, "綜合上述的因素在蔡的麒麟相對姚的麒麟有過之而無不及,如果你認為在姚的麒麟經已在最高水準,咁在蔡的麒麟又是什麼水準呢?你提出的證據我完全唔理?我老早已經指出啦! < 0係高班浮沉,演出飄忽,魂魄唔齊仲未踏入馬王級階段0既麒麟輸比當時正處於大熟大勇top form0既蝦仔...有說服力嗎? > 係你無回應0者......反而我問你用咩算式計出蝦王高過麒麟3個馬位你就真係無理喇!!仲0係度惡人先告狀??" on 02:24:22 06/08/04 Tue


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.