VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:48:05 04/14/04 Wed
Author: 旺財
Subject: 咁又唔係. 危險大師加十分, 燦惑加五匹左右應屬合理. 問題不在負於超級馬, 而是贏後面幾遠. 飛駿寶世紀之駒一役, 後面塵都無得食, 加十分不為過. 如沒有飛駿寶, 加十六分的便會是世紀之駒.
In reply to: 冼馬田 's message, "加十六分冇問題，只要對各匹馬標準一致就可以，否則就係唔公平。今季好多超級馬負於另一匹超級馬的例子，但都未見過好似「世紀之駒」咁加分法，例如「燦惑」兩次都只係輸「危險大師」少少，理論上「危險大師」一場加十分，「燦惑」就應該一場加八分，但事實上並唔係咁，結果「燦惑」就0係三班執多場先上二班咯。" on 01:04:01 04/14/04 Wed


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.