VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:54:18 04/23/03 Wed
Author: fiwee
Subject: Wow, that's a good question....but I'm thinking, NO....(m)
In reply to: 4grant 's message, "A crockpot question (m)" on 16:37:59 04/23/03 Wed

Because it doesn't seem like any amount of meat would be done in that short of a time on low.

I remember someone telling me once that it's really hard to overcook meat in a crock pot. The longer it cooks the more tender it gets, generally. If it were me, I think I'd compromise and check it after about 6 hours, then cook it longer if needed. But someone else might know the correct answer to this!

Kari

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Generally no...........(m) -- daddys_3_chicks, 20:46:23 04/23/03 Wed
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.