Tight 5 (and NB) did naff all apart from bare minimum. No dynamism or strength. BRow on back foot therefore game is v diff when this is the case. BUT the BRow did their job in tackling, spoiling. Athletic dynamic front 5 of the modern game ? No hope! THe ref appeared to allow Saes to play as they wished at break-down (Wal;es constantly told to release the tackled man?Eng kept hold of ball, tried to regain feet when still held...NEED I go on! -- Gwlad

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:34:08 03/24/02 Sun
Author: Griff
Author Host/IP: 212.31.114.179
Subject: Tight 5 (and NB) did naff all apart from bare minimum. No dynamism or strength. BRow on back foot therefore game is v diff when this is the case. BUT the BRow did their job in tackling, spoiling. Athletic dynamic front 5 of the modern game ? No hope! THe ref appeared to allow Saes to play as they wished at break-down (Wal;es constantly told to release the tackled man?Eng kept hold of ball, tried to regain feet when still held...NEED I go on!
In reply to: Gwl@d on the Tyne (the pissed version) 's message, "Its was bad, but it could ghave been bader" on 17:01:30 03/23/02 Sat

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.