Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Re: I think he means Eugene Author: Suky [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 23:08:21 05/01/03 Thu In reply to: Agatha 's message, "I think he means Eugene" on 19:43:47 04/28/03 Mon >Anyway, I >THINK he was referring to either Eugene in Hostile >Takeover or perhaps Lawrence Beesley in S.O.S. >Titanic. Eugene really is a loser, but Lawrence is >kinda cute, I thought. All interesting characters are losers in some way, aren't they? "Leading men" and action heroes always seem a little dull and predictable to me. Give me a flawed antihero any day! Eugene is one of my favorite characters, and I even liked the movie, although the cop interaction was pretty lame and clichéd. But I thought the basic story was intriguing and tragic. I watched SOS Titanic in the middle of the night during a severe bout of insomnia, so I don't remember much about it, but I agree that he wasn't really a loser in it. Didn't he even end up getting the girl in the end? Funny, that scene you mentioned, where they're talking at the railing, is the one scene that comes to mind when I think about the movie! DW is the best thing about Quest of the Delta Knights. He looked great as the good guy, and he was hilarious as the bad guy (although I didn't care for the black wig!). The MST3K version was great, but did you notice that they edited out most of DW's bad-guy scenes (sorry, the character's name escapes me at the moment!)? I consider that a compliment to DW's comedic skills since apparently those scenes weren't bad enough for them to spoof--and would probably have given the jokesters too much competition! What do you think? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I think he means Eugene Author: Hope you Guess My Name.... [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 19:58:47 05/17/03 Sat EUGENE WASN'T A LOSER!!!! he was misunderstood!!!! And Jack the Ripper Wasn't bad...He was just drawn that way!!! And Lovejoy wasn't an asshole.....he was badly constipated. Okay, Henry Buchannan might be a loser...but he got some..... >>Anyway, I >>THINK he was referring to either Eugene in Hostile >>Takeover or perhaps Lawrence Beesley in S.O.S. >>Titanic. Eugene really is a loser, but Lawrence is >>kinda cute, I thought. > >All interesting characters are losers in some way, >aren't they? "Leading men" and action heroes always >seem a little dull and predictable to me. Give me a >flawed antihero any day! Eugene is one of my favorite >characters, and I even liked the movie, although the >cop interaction was pretty lame and clichéd. But I >thought the basic story was intriguing and tragic. > >I watched SOS Titanic in the middle of the night >during a severe bout of insomnia, so I don't remember >much about it, but I agree that he wasn't really a >loser in it. Didn't he even end up getting the girl >in the end? Funny, that scene you mentioned, where >they're talking at the railing, is the one scene that >comes to mind when I think about the movie! > >DW is the best thing about Quest of the Delta Knights. > He looked great as the good guy, and he was hilarious >as the bad guy (although I didn't care for the black >wig!). The MST3K version was great, but did you >notice that they edited out most of DW's bad-guy >scenes (sorry, the character's name escapes me at the >moment!)? I consider that a compliment to DW's >comedic skills since apparently those scenes weren't >bad enough for them to spoof--and would probably have >given the jokesters too much competition! What do you >think? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Eugene did too Author: Agatha [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 05:59:02 05/27/03 Tue Eugene got some, too, as I recall. OK, so maybe he held up his office with an M-16 and was really fond of T.S. Eliot, but if I worked there with those people I'd go a little nuts, too. I think Lovejoy was the best thing about Titanic. Rose should have gotten back at her fiancee by sleeping with his butler instead of Jack. Hey, maybe we should start a new thread listing movies where DW's character gets lucky, that would be a lot more fun than his bad guy roles. >EUGENE WASN'T A LOSER!!!! he was misunderstood!!!! > >And Jack the Ripper Wasn't bad...He was just drawn >that way!!! > >And Lovejoy wasn't an asshole.....he was badly >constipated. > >Okay, Henry Buchannan might be a loser...but he got >some..... > >>>Anyway, I >>>THINK he was referring to either Eugene in Hostile >>>Takeover or perhaps Lawrence Beesley in S.O.S. >>>Titanic. Eugene really is a loser, but Lawrence is >>>kinda cute, I thought. >> >>All interesting characters are losers in some way, >>aren't they? "Leading men" and action heroes always >>seem a little dull and predictable to me. Give me a >>flawed antihero any day! Eugene is one of my favorite >>characters, and I even liked the movie, although the >>cop interaction was pretty lame and clichéd. But I >>thought the basic story was intriguing and tragic. >> >>I watched SOS Titanic in the middle of the night >>during a severe bout of insomnia, so I don't remember >>much about it, but I agree that he wasn't really a >>loser in it. Didn't he even end up getting the girl >>in the end? Funny, that scene you mentioned, where >>they're talking at the railing, is the one scene that >>comes to mind when I think about the movie! >> >>DW is the best thing about Quest of the Delta Knights. >> He looked great as the good guy, and he was hilarious >>as the bad guy (although I didn't care for the black >>wig!). The MST3K version was great, but did you >>notice that they edited out most of DW's bad-guy >>scenes (sorry, the character's name escapes me at the >>moment!)? I consider that a compliment to DW's >>comedic skills since apparently those scenes weren't >>bad enough for them to spoof--and would probably have >>given the jokesters too much competition! What do you >>think? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Eugene did too Author: HRB [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 21:15:09 05/27/03 Tue > >Hey, maybe we should start a new thread listing movies >where DW's character gets lucky, that would be a lot >more fun than his bad guy roles. Unfortunately, that would be a very short list. I can only think of three off hand....Eugene, Henry Buchanan, and Morgan. Any one else think of any others? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Another "winner" Author: Suky [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 13:19:27 06/05/03 Thu Has anyone seen The Little Unicorn? It's airing on Encore this month. DW is definitely *not* a loser in this movie. He plays the heroine's granddad, and he's in it quite a bit. He's one of the few sympathetic characters. (And he looks rather nice with a beard in it too. :-)) I still haven't gotten around to watching it yet, but from what I've seen, he has a similar role in Shergar, doesn't he? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Lucky? Author: Suky [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 09:19:28 05/28/03 Wed It also depends what you mean by "lucky" ... Some of his bad guys got lucky too (Jack the Ripper got lotsa girls), and Morgan didn't exactly live "happily ever after," at least not in conventional terms! Sounds like a fun topic, but could you clarify the "rules"? Thanks! [ Post a Reply to This Message ]