Re: David Warner is Doctor Who! -- David Warner: The Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Re: David Warner is Doctor Who!

Author:
HRB

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:44:08 05/05/03 Mon
In reply to: silver2 's message, "David Warner is Doctor Who!" on 08:04:32 05/05/03 Mon

I believe some of us had a discussion about this very role a while back. Now it's happening. Great news! Thanks for posting!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Nine is a magic number!

Author:
Suky
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:25:59 05/05/03 Mon

HRB! Good to see you again! Thanks for the news Silver2! That's so awesome! I wasn't in on that discussion, but, come to think of it, DW will make a *perfect* Dr. Who! I might finally become a fan of the series. (Coincidentally, one of my other favorite actors, about whom I'm just putting the finishing touches on a fansite, Cyril Cusack, turned down the role when it was first being cast back in '63. Guess I'm drawn to those Dr. Who types. ;-))

But ...

"David brought his own particular qualities and talent to the role and made the part his own - even if it's only for this one story'"

Only for this one story?? Are they planning to recast the role for each film? Are they trying to give everyone a chance at it or something? Why wouldn't they want to keep the same actor for all of them? (I may only become a temporary Dr. Who fan then. It's the Timothy Dalton/James Bond thing all over again.)

But the big question is: Will DW get the girl too?? ;-)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: Re: Nine is a magic number!
Author: HRB [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:14:16 05/05/03 Mon >HRB! Good to see you again! Good to see you too! Where the heck have you been? You're being missed, you know! Take the time to drop me a line, will ya? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: Re: Nine is a magic number!

Author:
Jen again
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:04:12 05/11/03 Sun

>(I
>may only become a temporary Dr. Who fan then. It's
>the Timothy Dalton/James Bond thing all over again.)
GMTA - I always thought the only real problem with Dalton was the scripts kept undercutting him. It wasn't that he was too dramatic; the stories were too soap-opera. He had a certain intensity that the Bond of the novels had (as far as I recall from reading them). What a shame.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: Aw geez I spoke too soon...

Author:
Jen again
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:36:01 05/11/03 Sun

From what I've read and my husband can figure, he's one of many Dr. Who number Nines who all exist in parallel universes. It's a licensed sub-franchise but apparently they didn't pay enough to show him wearing the scarf!!!!! Where's the fun in that?!?!?!?!? They just post a pic of him looking more like Jeffrey Jones in Ed Wood than one of the proper Doctors.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject:

Re: Aw geez I spoke too soon...

Author:
Suky
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:32:58 05/13/03 Tue

>From what I've read and my husband can figure, he's
>one of many Dr. Who number Nines who all exist in
>parallel universes. It's a licensed sub-franchise but
>apparently they didn't pay enough to show him wearing
>the scarf!!!!! Where's the fun in that?!?!?!?!? They
>just post a pic of him looking more like Jeffrey Jones
>in Ed Wood than one of the proper Doctors.

Your mention of a picture got me to go finally and look at that website (I just assumed the message was a repost and didn't bother to actually check out the URL) and realized--the new Dr. Who thing is only an audio recording. :-( Not that I don't love DW's audio work, but I thought there was going to be a new Dr. Who *movie*! Now *that* would've been awesome.

And that picture of him is awful! They've altered it so much it barely looks like him. He does look like Jeffrey Jones! Scary!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Nine is a magic number!

Author:
Suky
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:23:28 05/13/03 Tue

>GMTA - I always thought the only real problem with
>Dalton was the scripts kept undercutting him. It
>wasn't that he was too dramatic; the stories were too
>soap-opera. He had a certain intensity that the Bond
>of the novels had (as far as I recall from reading
>them). What a shame.

"GMTA"?

I'm glad you agree! I thought I was the only person who liked Dalton as Bond. I never understood why he was so unpopular. I haven't read the books, but I liked his intensity.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Nine is a magic number!
Author: Jen [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:32:35 05/14/03 Wed >"GMTA"? Great minds think alike! >I haven't read the books, but I >liked his intensity. All the girls I meet who've read the books remember that line in Diamonds Are Forever about how Bond has ice gray eyes and, so it says in the book, when he makes love they blaze like diamonds. The book Bond is not a funny Bond. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]