Re: Hey ADept -- GauchoLocos.com Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:04:59 07/03/03 Thu
Author: Mike
Subject: Re: Hey ADept
In reply to: Hi Ho 's message, "Re: Hey ADept" on 00:59:14 07/03/03 Thu

It may be too late to get any decent schools to play us in the 'Dome, but I'd take a 200+ RPI team over nothing at all. There *must* be at least a handful of schools willing to sign on to a home and away series.

Just don't ask me to name one :)

>You have expanded on my original point. But did you
>read IVDrip's response? Apparently it is too late.
>
>
>>Either I have my facts wrong, or there exists an ideal
>>situation for both UCSB and Westmont. Last year's
>>exhibition game did not count in our standings (RPI,
>>NCAA, or otherwise). Most, if not all, UCSB fans find
>>this the ideal situation.
>>
>>Here's where my facts get kinda fuzzy. I thought that
>>in the eyes of Westmont and *their* sanctioning
>>bodies, the game counted as an official game, thus
>>effecting their power rankings. I would think that
>>this represents a huge motivation for Westmont playing
>>us. It's gotta be close to their ideal situation.
>>Their only beef to it being an exhibition would be an
>>issue of pride (being dissed). Hey, we're in the
>>position of power with our relationship with Westmont.
>> If given the choice between an "exhibition" or no
>>game at all, the answer should be a no brainer.
>>
>>From where I'm sittin', it looks like a win-win
>>situation for both sports programs. Why not repeat
>>what we did last year and schedule another D-1 home
>>game?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>So how about adding another D1, even if it's a
>>>>>low-to mid-major, whoever is available, to the
>>sched,
>>>>>and move Westmont to another date if necessary, as
>>an
>>>>>exhibition like last year? It should get us a
>little
>>>>>power rating edge, not to mention giving the fans
>>>>>another fairly decent home game.(Well, we never
>know
>>>>>how decent they will be, do we? ... :) )
>>>>
>>>>Time for a reality check. The coaching staff has
>been
>>>>trying for the last 10 months to get someone, ANYONE
>>>>to come here, with no luck. Zero. Zip. Why would you
>>>>think that would change now that just about
>>everyone's
>>>>locked in their schedule for next year? We're lucky
>>>>Westmont will play us, otherwise we would have only
>>>>two home games. That's the sad, sad fact, so let's
>>>>start facing it.
>>>
>>>I hear you, but very recently I thought I saw on the
>>>old board that SW Missouri St and one other school
>>>were still available, or I would not have brought it
>>>up again this late in the game. If my memory is on
>the
>>>fritz, I apologize. On a brighter note, the grapevine
>>>is murmuring that things look better for the next
>year
>>>or two. Let's hope for the best.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]