VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:26:27 10/28/17 Sat
Author: WTK
Subject: Re: The KQV vs. WIXZ battle
In reply to: Tom Lacko 's message, "Re: The KQV vs. WIXZ battle" on 16:49:55 10/27/17 Fri

Both KQV and WIXZ had signal issues, especially at night. Probably a lot of listeners went with whichever sounded best in their part of town. In my case, that definitely was KQV (and WZUM). After WIXZ adopted an oldies-heavy format in late 1970, I made more of an effort to listen.

13Q sounded better than either in most of the city, especially after an unfortunate accident at the tower site forced them to get a waiver from the FCC to broadcast nondirectional at night. :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.