Subject: The importance of the NCAA to Olympic sports |
Author: SpuytenDuyvil76
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 06:39:30 07/23/24 Tue
This morning's Boston Globe carries an article by sports opinion writer, Tara Sullivan, on the criticality of the college and university sports system in the U.S. to the competitiveness of the U.S. Olympic team. Whether the NCAA is absolutely necessary to the success of that system may be open to question. Nonetheless, 75% of the Olympic squad are coming out of the collegiate sport system. The article cites the negative factors to that system effecting change: anti-trust decisions, NIL, transfer portal, unionization.
The article is here. https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/07/23/sports/olympics-ncaa-college-sports/
Because there is a paywall, here are a few quotes:
"From archery to wrestling, and all the alphabetical points in between, Olympians are nurtured on college campuses."
"[The most recent antitrust] settlement is saying that those that have generated the money should get it. So those of us in the industry, the revenue sharing we’ve done in the past, taking the money generated from football and basketball and share it, that’s no longer the equation.
“Those who are generating the money get it, so fewer kids getting more money. We are wrestling with that landscape. For 40-50 years, we built college athletics on gender equity and competitive equity. The court said otherwise.
“That’s going to come at a cost somewhere. I’m not sure where yet. But I think obviously the concern is that it will, over time, impact Olympic sports."
I am not sure how much subsidization, if any, is done by the football and basketball in the Ivies. The model is clearly different. We have the luxury of a large donor class.
If you do not care about the non-revenue sports, then fine. The amateur, well-rounded student may be an outmoded notion. The modern Olympics began as a gentlemen's vision of upper-crust amateur sports, much the same model as the early Ivy sports, but have since evolved beyond that, as have Ivy sports, and indeed, collegiate sports in general.
Yet it could well be argued the modern Olympics are irrelevant. Canary in a coal mine? Let the bread and circuses continue.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|