Author: Observer15 (Injury)
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 11:12:08 05/16/24 Thu
In reply to:
Ed S.
's message, "The question we always ask: Why no Ivy League postseason football?" on 09:14:37 05/12/24 Sun
One issue is given only minor consideration here: concussions. The Ivy League presidents have been focused on this, listening to physicians and Public Health professionals and neurosurgeons. They have taken many steps to try to address this, as have coaches, now fully aware. Yes, other sports have concussions. But other than rugby, statistically football is the most dangerous sport. I suspect for reasons of this, a few Ivy League presidents (I am guessing new as well as old) would be OK with eliminating football. Since they can't, or won't, or don't wish to, or recognize the impossibility, or agree on all of its many benefits, including to the students who play, and to the alumni who watch, and to school spirit, they are still highly unlikely to prolong a season which offers more opportunities for such medical issues. Certain high profile and devastating injuries in the past years can only have confirmed this. All sports carry risk, of course, and longterm orthopedic injuries prevail. But risks to the head? The brain? That no doubt captures their attention. Delimiting this must be high on their minds.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |