VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]8910 ]
Subject: Re: State of The League


Author:
Ivy Patriot
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:32:58 10/06/25 Mon
In reply to: John Harvard 's message, "Re: State of The League" on 11:48:29 10/05/25 Sun

Harvard knows better than to sleep on Merrimack. The last time they met the Crimson barely survived. Dartmouth needed a fg at the end to beat Merrimack last year. They will be the best test Harvard has faced so far.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> Subject: Re: State of The League


Author:
John Harvard (Merrimack)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:57:50 10/06/25 Mon

If Harvard doesn't handle Cornell and Merrimack, then we'll know that there is limited upside.

Cornell is 0-3, but was even with Yale (14-14) at the half.

Merrimack is 3-3. Just looking at stats, it looks like Merrimack has a stout running attack, averaging 175 yards/game. On the other hand, Merrimack's quarterbacks complete <50% of their passes for about 150 yards/game and 4 INT's.

Time of Possession is about 35 to 25 for each of Merrimack and Harvard. Harvard's ball control is likely due to sitting on leads in the second halves. Merrimacks seems to be due to it's reliance on it's running attack: 244 rushes vs 155 passes.


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.