Re: CPL taiji as middle frame -- Chen Pan Ling Taijiquan

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tue, Dec 03 2024, 9:39:23 PST [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, Apr 16 2007, 19:05:57 PDT
Author: Formosa Neijia
Author Host/IP: 211-72-233-8.HINET-IP.hinet.net / 211.72.233.8
Subject: Re: CPL taiji as middle frame
In reply to: Dave 's message, "Re: CPL taiji as middle frame" on Mon, Apr 16 2007, 9:04:48 PDT

You obviously didn't bother to read a single thing that I wrote. No where did I talk about force-on-force or using physical conditioning in taiji.

At this point, I suggest that you go back to the second post that I made and read what i wrote. I'm clearly interested in discussing CPL taiji AS A MIDDLE FRAME FORM. That is the title of the thread.

To get us on track, here's what I wrote there:
"Seeing most people do the CPL taiji, I can�t help but wonder if they will ever develop any martial arts prowess from just doing the middle frame practice. After all, not every CPL group does the small and large frames, or even considers them valid. I say that because there is a idea out there that CPL taji should be practiced exactly as CPL showed it in his book. But then the book was written just before CPL died. Should the postures ALWAYS be done that way knowing that CPL was no where near his prime then? The answer is obvious."

THIS is the whole post that I wrote on my blog:
http://formosaneijia.com/2007/cpl-taiji-as-middle-frame/

Does anyone have any thoughts on CPL taiji as middle frame vs. large or small frame?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: CPL taiji as middle frame -- Khari, Tue, Apr 17 2007, 21:22:29 PDT (cpe-74-73-65-77.nyc.res.rr.com/74.73.65.77)
- Re: CPL taiji as middle frame -- Formosa Neijia, Wed, Apr 18 2007, 7:43:59 PDT (tp-s2-c7r3.router.hinet.net/211.72.233.9)