Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>And you just proved his point. Nice work. You took a >childish thread and made it even worse. > >>No, Tribbie-Tyke. I made the point you'd rather I not >>have made: that neither paper has a corner on the >>correction market. What forced you to take umbrage was >>the fact I mentioned the Trib tends to deny and bury >>their corrections better than the PG does. PG is >>arrogant one way [John R and Beltway] and as for the >>Trib, we already know how their arrogance works. >> >>Hey, answer this question, would ya? Does the Trib >>offer rewards to the kiddies who post anti-PG digs >>here? And if so, what kind? >> >>>Great comments FD! Rather than address the issue, >you >>>give the classic nondenial denial answer: Hey the >Trib >>>makes mistakes, too. >>> >>>Classic PG arrogance! >>> >>>>Boy, that's something! >>>> >>>>And by golly, I betcha up the river on Martindale >>>>Street, the staff NEVER MAKES MISTAKES! No. Never. >>Or >>>>they ignore them unless the complainer is a local >>>>rightie or otherwise has clout with the Trib >>>>"mis-management." Then they might get a correction. >>>>Perhaps. >>>> >>>>>Monday's P-G had nine items under Corrections. Is >>>that >>>>>a record?

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.