Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Did someone appoint you the hall monitor of this site >or did you take it on yourself? I don't think anyone >cares. > >>And you just proved his point. Nice work. You took a >>childish thread and made it even worse. >> >>>No, Tribbie-Tyke. I made the point you'd rather I not >>>have made: that neither paper has a corner on the >>>correction market. What forced you to take umbrage >was >>>the fact I mentioned the Trib tends to deny and bury >>>their corrections better than the PG does. PG is >>>arrogant one way [John R and Beltway] and as for the >>>Trib, we already know how their arrogance works. >>> >>>Hey, answer this question, would ya? Does the Trib >>>offer rewards to the kiddies who post anti-PG digs >>>here? And if so, what kind? >>> >>>>Great comments FD! Rather than address the issue, >>you >>>>give the classic nondenial denial answer: Hey the >>Trib >>>>makes mistakes, too. >>>> >>>>Classic PG arrogance! >>>> >>>>>Boy, that's something! >>>>> >>>>>And by golly, I betcha up the river on Martindale >>>>>Street, the staff NEVER MAKES MISTAKES! No. Never. >>>Or >>>>>they ignore them unless the complainer is a local >>>>>rightie or otherwise has clout with the Trib >>>>>"mis-management." Then they might get a correction. >>>>>Perhaps. >>>>> >>>>>>Monday's P-G had nine items under Corrections. Is >>>>that >>>>>>a record?

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.