Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>The relative apathy on this site is exactly what I >have tried to address. When every thread breaks down >into Trib Kiddies Suck vs. PG sucks, a potentially >useful message board goes to waste. > >>Did someone appoint you the hall monitor of this site >>or did you take it on yourself? I don't think anyone >>cares. >> >>>And you just proved his point. Nice work. You took a >>>childish thread and made it even worse. >>> >>>>No, Tribbie-Tyke. I made the point you'd rather I >not >>>>have made: that neither paper has a corner on the >>>>correction market. What forced you to take umbrage >>was >>>>the fact I mentioned the Trib tends to deny and bury >>>>their corrections better than the PG does. PG is >>>>arrogant one way [John R and Beltway] and as for the >>>>Trib, we already know how their arrogance works. >>>> >>>>Hey, answer this question, would ya? Does the Trib >>>>offer rewards to the kiddies who post anti-PG digs >>>>here? And if so, what kind? >>>> >>>>>Great comments FD! Rather than address the issue, >>>you >>>>>give the classic nondenial denial answer: Hey the >>>Trib >>>>>makes mistakes, too. >>>>> >>>>>Classic PG arrogance! >>>>> >>>>>>Boy, that's something! >>>>>> >>>>>>And by golly, I betcha up the river on Martindale >>>>>>Street, the staff NEVER MAKES MISTAKES! No. >Never. >>>>Or >>>>>>they ignore them unless the complainer is a local >>>>>>rightie or otherwise has clout with the Trib >>>>>>"mis-management." Then they might get a >correction. >>>>>>Perhaps. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Monday's P-G had nine items under Corrections. Is >>>>>that >>>>>>>a record?

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.