Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>A&E was less tacky under Walton's leadership. Case >closed. > >>I would have to agree Walton is not cutting the >>multimedia bit. NewsNOW, or the "Sam Bennett Show" as >>some of her colleagues called it, should have been >>yanked after a week. But Walton at Features was >>superior to "grind 'er out" Massey. Walton's mistake >>over there was letting a few oafs get away with too >>much, validating Allan Block's remark during contract >>talks that the paper employs too many writers who >>can't write. >> >>That Massey or anyone thinks spotlighting "Cat's Call" >>can enhance the paper says plenty. Judging from her >>"work," the terminally air-headed Ms. Specter is so >>shallow she barely qualifies for Trib Kiddie status. >>Hyping her does the paper no good beyond mollifying >>her buddy and top booster, supreme egomaniac Tony >>Norman. He and his minions will offer the excuse >>Specter's silliness attracts younger readers, a >>delusion at worst, fantasy at best. >> >>Long run, none of it matters if ad bucks keep drying >>up. The time approaches when the Guild will sit down >>with management and the chopfest they've avoided will >>be in full swing. I'm relieved I bailed before that >>day of reckoning. >> >>Nothing qualifies Walton at all. >>>He was very average as features editor and he is >awful >>>as AME for multimedia. >>> >>>It seems like everything on his watch involves >>>shooting hours and hours of video, then when it is >>>uploaded to the site, it is pared down to 20 >seconds. >>> >>>Walton has no more business being an AME than anyone >>>on the Boulevard. The really sad part is that he >>>thinks he is doing a bang up job.

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.