Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Yes, Huffington Post is a hysterical lefty operation >that often slants its headlines in ways that are at >total odds with the stories beneath them. > >Unfortunately, Francis, your ignorance and agenda >seems to be paramount here. Clearly, you don't know >the meaning of the term "de facto" (unofficial), no >surprise since your own ideology and agenda are pretty >clear by now. And why is it you cannot discuss the >local tea party coverage? Is it because you don't know >much about our local print media, perhaps? This is >what you should be commenting on: > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09253/996934-54.st >m">http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09253/996934-54.stm</ >a> > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/ne >ws/westmoreland/s_642923.html">http://www.pittsburghliv >e.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/westmoreland/s_642923.html< >/a> > >Fact: Fox's hosts, O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck among >others the others have been pushing this movement on >their respective programs. They are far from the only >ones. And don't give me this crap about "where did you >get your proof?" You know damned well they've been >doing it. Watch any of them. So has the ultra-paranoid >Michelle Malkin. And yes, Olbermann's been blasting >away from the lib side. > >I saw a distant shot of the rally on CNN Saturday. >There were undeniably tens of thousands there. But the >crowd did not fill the entire mall. It filled more >than half, but not down to and around the Washington >Monument. You of course won't believe that since it >doesn't suit your viewpoint. > >Check this nonpartisan site. Note it won a Pulitzer, >which is probably enough to make it suspect to you. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2 >009/sep/14/tea-party-photo-shows-large-crowd-different- >event/">http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article >/2009/sep/14/tea-party-photo-shows-large-crowd-differen >t-event/</a> > >Face it, Francis. Whether you're one of Dick Scaife's >one-dimensional posse of rightie ideologues (which >wouldn't surprise me a bit) or whomever, you aren't >here to comment on local print media's coverage of the >issue around the region. You moseyed in to stir a >p***ing contest about the liberal media and tea >parties. Nothing anyone says will satisfy you because >this is part of the far right's agenda. And the far >left is no better. Huffington Post distorts the >truth. So did ACORN, and so do the Tea Party folks. >The extremes are never far apart. > >Your type of logic not only drives the Obama birthers, >but flat earthers, the Bigfoot believers and folks who >think the moon landing was faked. Oh, and don't forget >the Triltateral Commission, the Black Helicopter folks >and the ones who insist they have it on good >information that Elvis manages a donut place in Idaho. > > >>Fox promoted the event? Where did you get this >>information? >>Provide a reputable source. And you reference the >>Huffington Post? Ha ha ha ha! C'mon Shopper, can you >>not do better than that? All the usual liberal >>suspects! >> >>>Fox has a vested interest in saying so. After all, >>>they were one of the de facto promoters of the whole >>>thing. >>> >>>I kind of like this little bit of info. >>> >>><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >>>href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/14/912-te >a >>- >>>party-photo-false_n_286082.html">http://www.huffingto >n >>p >>>ost.com/2009/09/14/912-tea-party-photo-false_n_286082 >. >>h >>>tml</a>

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.