Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Ah, a hypocrite who pompously declares, he or she >"speaks of the pursuit of the truth." When it suits >you. > >Indeed the core of journalism is truth, as opposed to >whatever ideology you choose to practice. Using your >"prove it" logic, Show me where Huffington reported >1500, would you? They're pretty weird over there but >not that weird. > >Then you declare, "Let's just say" the crowd was 200K. >I thought you were pursuing "the truth." Your truth, >I suspect. What's the real number? Remember, the truth. > >From your pompous handle on down, your mission is >obvious. You are a troll, here to talk gibberish and >throw in occasional nuggests of coherency to add >credibility. Given the blather you've posted so far, >it's obvious you're not from here and you know nothing >about Pittsburgh media (though you've got the Daily >Mail nailed down). You're just an interloper looking >to mix it up but you come off more as comic relief. >Thanks for the laugh, dude. > >>I speak of the pursuit of the truth. The core of our >>profession. And your response? I saw the video on >>Youtube and did not seek the source. It was one of >>scores from many sources. Who cares. It appears that >>the crowds were massive. Huffington puts the crowd >>estimate at 1500. Let's just say the crowd was 200,000 >>(although based on pictures and video, I would say it >>appeared several times larger). Yeah, the event was >>largely ignored by the mainstream media. >>Radical Moderate attempts ridicule of a voice >>perceived by him to be in opposition to his (and >>yours, and therefore automatically far-right) by >>speaking of my belief in Bigfoot and Elvis sightings. >>Should I brand you a typical leftist? Seems that way! >>The Daily Mail in London took a lot of heat prior to >>ww2 because they felt an invasion of England was >>imminent based on feedback from their journalists and >>their sources throughout Europe and the world. They >>called it like they saw it. They faced ridicule even >>from the British government. Turns out they were >>right. >>My mission here can be summed up by stating this -Look >>past the rhetoric and seek the truth brother. Do your >>job. >> >> >>>Oh, so you use a video tied to Glenn Beck to show >your >>>objectivity. No wonder you "like this little bit of >>>info." >>> >>>Thanks for revealing your motives for being here. And >>>say hi to the gang at Heritage or whatever rightie >>>foundation sent you here to stir things up. Buh-bye! >>> >>> >>>>Better idea, try this: <a rel=nofollow target=_blank >>>>href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sjvc6baor8&fea >t >>u >>>r >>>>e=player_embedded">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s >j >>v >>>c >>>>6baor8&feature=player_embedded</a> >>>> >>>>>Fox has a vested interest in saying so. After all, >>>>>they were one of the de facto promoters of the >whole >>>>>thing. >>>>> >>>>>I kind of like this little bit of info. >>>>> >>>>><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >>>>>href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/14/912- >t >>e >>>a >>>>- >>>>>party-photo-false_n_286082.html">http://www.huffing >t >>o >>>n >>>>p >>>>>ost.com/2009/09/14/912-tea-party-photo-false_n_2860 >8 >>2 >>>. >>>>h >>>>>tml</a>

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.