Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>FRANCIS: "I speak of the pursuit of the truth. The >core of our profession." > >Glenn Beck and Jeremiah Wright think they're pursuing >truth as well. Their versions and variations on truth. >Not objective, informed truth. > >FRANCIS: "I saw the video on Youtube and did not seek >the source." > >If so, sir, then you are not a journalist as you claim. > >FRANCIS: "It was one of scores from many sources. Who >cares." > >See my previous response. > >FRANCIS: "It appears that the crowds were massive. >Huffington puts the crowd estimate at 1500. Let's just >say the crowd was 200,000(although based on pictures >and video, I would say it appeared several times >larger)." > >Define "massive," Francis. True journalists do not >"just say the crowd was 200,000." They get real >numbers. Obviously the biases on both sides obfuscated >(look it up if you don't know what it means) the >figures. > >FRANCIS: "Yeah, the event was largely ignored by the >mainstream media." > >Because YOU say it was? Sorry, no. It was not. The >coverage just did not get through your tinfoil, >Francis. > >FRANCIS: "Radical Moderate attempts ridicule of a >voice perceived by him to be in opposition to his (and >yours, and therefore automatically far-right) by >speaking of my belief in Bigfoot and Elvis sightings." > >No, Radical Moderate ridiculed someone who came in >asking a question and did not like the detailed and >substantive answers that question generated, including >the noting of two extensive stories about LOCAL Tea >Parties in the two Pittsburgh dailies, one of them a >paper whose politics are so far-right they make Fox >News look like NPR. > >Yes, Radical Moderate did ridicule the conspiracy >theory mentality of your comments, not because they >were opposed to mine, because I stand with neither >extreme. But the paranoia fairly gushed through all >your comments, and it has the jittery, twisted logic >that drives all conspiracy theorists. The fact you >express yourself with hilariously stilted prose only >makes it more amusing. Love to hear your views about >flouridated water, Francis. > >FRANCIS: "Should I brand you a typical leftist? Seems >that way!" > >You of all folks would be foolish enough to do so, I >suppose. Note the slams in my posts on ACORN, Rev. >Wright, NPR, etc. if you can find lefty politics in >that, baby, have at it. > >FRANCIS: "The Daily Mail in London took a lot of heat >prior to ww2 because they felt an invasion of England >was imminent based on feedback from their journalists >and their sources throughout Europe and the world. >They called it like they saw it. They faced ridicule >even from the British government. Turns out they were >right." > >What does the Daily Mail in London circa 1940 have to >do with US Tea Parties circa 2009? Have you noted the >name of this forum? If so can you please explain the >relevancy of your commentary to this forum? Do you >know anything about the local dailies in Pittsburgh, >one run by a moderate liberal family, the other by a >far-right rich guy who uses it as a toy, pushing his >agenda in a quite shoddy package. > >FRANCIS:"My mission here can be summed up by stating >this -Look past the rhetoric and seek the truth >brother. Do your >job." > >LOL! Your MISSION? Who are you? Ethan Hunt or Jim >Phelps from "Mission Impossible?" the planet Remulac? >Who SENT you on this "mission?" Colonel Kurtz? G. >Gordon Liddy? Cartman from TV's "South Park?" >Starfleet Command? > >"Seek the truth brother?" Dawg, you ain't my brother >for sure! And as far as doing my job, I do. You might >take some time and figure out what your job is. >Meantime, a lot of X-Files sites and forums would >probably welcome you with open arms. They're always >looking for a new Fox Mulder. > >Over and out. > > >>>Oh, so you use a video tied to Glenn Beck to show >your >>>objectivity. No wonder you "like this little bit of >>>info." >>> >>>Thanks for revealing your motives for being here. And >>>say hi to the gang at Heritage or whatever rightie >>>foundation sent you here to stir things up. Buh-bye! >>> >>> >>>>Better idea, try this: <a rel=nofollow target=_blank >>>>href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sjvc6baor8&fea >t >>u >>>r >>>>e=player_embedded">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s >j >>v >>>c >>>>6baor8&feature=player_embedded</a> >>>> >>>>>Fox has a vested interest in saying so. After all, >>>>>they were one of the de facto promoters of the >whole >>>>>thing. >>>>> >>>>>I kind of like this little bit of info. >>>>> >>>>><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >>>>>href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/14/912- >t >>e >>>a >>>>- >>>>>party-photo-false_n_286082.html">http://www.huffing >t >>o >>>n >>>>p >>>>>ost.com/2009/09/14/912-tea-party-photo-false_n_2860 >8 >>2 >>>. >>>>h >>>>>tml</a>

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.