Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>As the "Poster 2" to whom you are referring, I'd >appreciate an English translation of your nonsensical >remark. > >If you knew anything at all, you would be cognizant of >the fact that for 36 years, since Scaife bought the >original Tribune Review in Greensburg, bad writing has >been the norm. > >ShootAimReady is clearly one of those staffers (or >more likely, interns) who knows but can't tolerate the >fact Trib staffers are hired based on their lack of >talent and based on that ineptitude, are willing to >work for nothing. > >The vast majority of the Trib editorial staff have no >more chance of ever becoming real journalists than >Andy Dick has of becoming the next Stone Cold Steve >Austin. > >>Both posters prove GanjaJim's point. Poster 2 shows he >>knows not what writing is. >> >> >> >> >>>Maybe they think it less significant than a >>>Trib-Kiddie does. >>> >>>Or maybe, just MAYBE, the "Trib Bashers" you mention >>>know it's beyond the scope of this forum to start an >>>argument about the merits of a Trib editorial >>>viewpoint when the foous over here is on the >direction >>>and quality or lack of quality in all area newspapers >>>and the work of their staffs. >>> >>>PS. I see a lot of links to PG articles over here >with >>>derogatory comments. Perhaps you don't see what you >>>don't want to see, eh? >>> >>>You say, "That's about par for their zealous >course?" >>>No, no. That kind of an ill-constructed, incoherent >>>sentence is about par for the writing of most Trib >>>staffers. >>> >>>>The Trib calls for the legalization of marijuana and >>>>the Trib Bashers go into hiding. That's about par >for >>>>their zealous course.

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.