Re: To hell with them -and may they rot. -- The Lonely Canadian Writer

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:55:39 04/23/06 Sun GMT-5
Author: Roger
Author Host/IP: ppp271.dsl.ontario.net / 209.159.177.17
Subject: Re: To hell with them -and may they rot.
In reply to: DianeG 's message, "Re: To hell with them -and may they rot." on 14:37:14 02/28/06 Tue GMT-5

WEll, twenty years from now, I shall certainly be deadd, so if I'm going to publish, I am going to have to sum sib, eh?

>>I do know your feelings abut sim subs and agree. I've
>mailed the story to a second market just needed to
>rant a while about trials and tribulations. In fact I
>might write a longer rant about this for our local
>branch. Why not?
>
>DianeG
>
>I think you know my feelings on this matter, Diane,
>>but allow me to reiterate: sim subs are the only way
>>to go. You will die waiting to be published if you
>>wait for many of these magazines. There are many
>>enlightened ones these days who encourage sim subs --
>>the Orchid Review in the US is one, and they have a
>>great little rant on their site about it.
>>
>>I think any magazine that really thinks writers are
>>going to send them a story and then wait for a year or
>>more for a rejection and then try another market is
>>kidding themselves. Not to mention arrogant. As they
>>point out on Orchid's site, the average story is
>>rejected 20 times before it's accepted. So have you
>>got twenty years to wait before your story sees the
>>light of day? I don't. And as for magazines that put
>>your name in a special file if you sim sub and get
>>accepted elsewhere, I say to hell with them. Do you
>>really need to take that kind of shit from anybody?
>>
>>Arrrrr,
>>
>>Lori
>>
>>>Dear LCW members:
>>>
>>>I spent part of yesterday doing some market research,
>>>since I have a story I'd like to send to a second
>>>market. I'm beginning to think I maybe writers should
>>>sign cover letters "submissively yours" go ahead and
>>>kick me why don't you? At least they should if they
>>>submit work to some of the magazines out there.
>>>
>>>A lot of them won't accept simultaneous submissions,
>>>sure, fine, we all know that. Did you know that
>>>there's also a literary magazine that says if you
>send
>>>us something and then withdraw it because it's been
>>>accepted elsewhere (life is full of dreams) then we
>>>will keep your name in a special file. Now that
>sounds
>>>like a threat to me. Oh yes, and we also take up to a
>>>year to reply to submissions. Well, they sure won't
>>>have to worry about filing one of my stories
>>anywhere.
>>>
>>>I was keeping track of how many mags don't accept sim
>>>subs AND take months to answer, but I've given up -
>>>there are too many.
>>>
>>>subversively yours
>>>
>>>Diane

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]