VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:28:12 12/20/08 Sat GMT-5
Author: DianeG
Author Host/IP: bas1-kitchener06-1096647754.dsl.bell.ca / 65.93.132.74
Subject: Re: The F word
In reply to: Lori 's message, "Re: Contractions. When and when not to use them" on 16:16:46 12/18/08 Thu GMT-5

On a couple of internet discussion boards, I've noticed that people circumvent no f word polices by typing fook, or fcuk for fuck. It's silly since everyone knows what is meant.

Diane

>I put it in the external ones, too. Though as far as I
>know, there's no contraction for 'fuck'. Fu'k? F'ck?
>Fuc'.
>
>Lori
>
>>I mean, hell, Lori even puts the word 'fuck' in her
>>internal monologues.
>>
>>>I wish I knew what happened to the witty and
>extensive
>>>reply that i made to this question. Anyway, go with
>>>the sound. In fiction, you are often in the internal
>>>narrative of the narrator, and contractions are OK.
>If
>>>you are writing an annual report for a company, not
>so
>>>much.
>>>
>>>Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>>Myself, I think the only thing regulating when or
>not
>>>>to use contractions is the formality of the piece.
>>>>There's the emphasis issue, too -- 'I did not do
>>that'
>>>>is stronger than 'I didn't do that'. Possibly, in
>>>>fiction, the speaker's background, too.
>>>>
>>>>I'm a-goin' to post a Xmas thing. Soon.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>Lori
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Probably no one will read this unil after
>Christmas,
>>>>>so I hope everyone had a Merry Christmas, or Merry
>>>>>Xmas, or Happy Holidays.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lately, Ive been considering contractions and when
>>>and
>>>>>when not to use them.
>>>>>Didn't versus did not
>>>>>could't
>>>>>wouldn't
>>>>>isn't etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>For instance, I have used - he did not intend,
>>>instead
>>>>>of - he didn't intend, to place a stronger emphasis
>>>on
>>>>>the 'not' but in other sentences I used didn't.
>>etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>Also what about they've, she'd, he'd and they'd
>>>>>which I think should only be used in dialogue.
>>>>>
>>>>>Comments?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.