VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:43:27 10/15/03 Wed
Author: Garry Denke
Subject: Stonehenge Limestone Conodonts

But only one theory embraces all 3 Stonehenge Phase I, II, and III models,
inclusive of the first stone hedge of Stonehenge, its elder white limestone.

[i]Doctor Garry Denke, Dentist (1622-1699)[/i]
[i]-Stonehenge Great White Teeth Theory-[/i]

[b]1) Stonehenge Great White Phase I Fish Teeth (outer limestone conodonts)[/b]

[img]http://www.nhm.ac.uk/palaeontology/palaeovision/conodonts.gif[/img]

[b](see Carboniferous Limestone palaeontology below)[/b]

[img]http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/gsc/calgary/labs/images/conodont.jpg[/img]

[b]2) Stonehenge Great White Phase II Shark Teeth (double row bluestones)[/b]

[img]http://people.ucsc.edu/~evpons/Stonehenge.jpg[/img]

[b]Compare Double Row Proportional Sized Girths:[/b]

[img]http://www.pvisuals.com/dinosaur_museum/more_stuff/images/sculpt_greatwhitejaws.jpg[/img]

[b]Compare Double Row Proportional Sized Girths:[/b]

[img]http://www.blueh20.com/fishpics/jaw_t.jpg[/img]

[b]3) Stonehenge Great White Phase III Baby Teeth (central younger sarsens)[/b]

Conodonts (Paleozoic fish teeth) are prolific in the first stones hauled to Stonehenge in its Phase I construction, the foreign Carboniferous (Paleozoic) Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation quarried rock. However, conodonts were extinct by Mesozoic time, therefore they are not present in the local [i]in situ[/i] Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation, the geologic outcrop rock of Stonehenge. Presence of conodonts (Paleozoic fish teeth) in these first stones brought to Stonehenge set the motif for its Phase II construction, the great white shark teeth model (in bluestones from across the Wales blue sea), and for its Phase III construction, the ten (10) baby teeth of the mother giving birth to them. Ten (10) was a significant number to the ancients whose young had ten (10) upper baby teeth, ten (10 lower baby teeth, ten (10) upper baby fingers, and ten (10) lower baby toes. The proportional girth sizes of Stonehenge Sarsens 51-60 to ten (10) baby teeth unified the Garry Whilhelm Denke 1656 dental theory with the Anthony M. Perks and Darlene Marie Bailey 2002 birth canal theory as one in the same through [i]Man's Evolution of Teeth[/i], e.g., Phase I conodonts fish teeth, Phase II great white shark teeth, and Phase III male/female baby teeth. [i]Note the baby tongue 'Altar Stone' below.[/i]

[b]Compare Ten (10) Proportional Sized Girths:[/b]

[img]http://www.timpetersandcompany.com/newsletter/images/generations_04/Primary-teeth-final.gif[/img]

[b]Compare Ten (10) Proportional Sized Girths:[/b]

[img]http://www.amherst.edu/~ermace/sth/bwmap.jpeg[/img]

[b]Compare Ten (10) Proportional Sized Girths:[/b]

[img]http://www.cyberdentist.com/images/primary.gif[/img]

[b]Chronology of Stonehenge Construction Materials Used:[/b]
[i]The first (1st) discovered by Dr. Garry Whilhelm Denke (1656)[/i]

The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise [b]the first (1st) foreign[/b] construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Birnbeck Limestone Formation ([b]Stonehenge Whitestones[/b]).

[img]http://origins.swau.edu/gifs/geologic.jpg[/img]

The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise [b]the first (1st) local[/b] [i]in situ[/i] construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Seaford Chalk Formation ([b]Stonehenge White Chalk[/b]).

The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise [b]the second (2nd) foreign[/b] construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Ordovician Volcanics ([b]Stonehenge Bluestones[/b]).

The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sedimentary sandstone rocks comprise [b]the third (3rd) foreign[/b] construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Old Red Sandstone Formation ([b]Stonehenge Coshestons[/b]).

The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise [b]the fourth (4th) foreign[/b] construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These rocks are locally called the Reading Formation ([b]Stonehenge Sarsens[/b]).

[url]http://www.bgs.ac.uk/education/britstrat/timecharts/phaner.html[/url]

[b]1/4 Stonehenge Counterscarp, 3/4 Stonehenge Mound, and Bottom 1/2 Heelstone Ditch contain Conodonts:[/b]

[img]http://www.orionbeadling.net/CSCARPelev.jpg[/img]

[b]Current Locations of the First Stones brought to Stonehenge:[/b]
[i]~800,000 pounds ~400 tons ~8,510 cubic-feet of foreign limestone[/i]

[b]a)[/b] 1/4 Counterscarp still in place is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock.

[b]b)[/b] 3/4 Counterscarp remnants are foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock. [b]Note:[/b] 3/4 Counterscarp rebuilt with local earth soil after 3/4 Counterscarp limestone was removed and piled at Stonehenge mound located 100 meters East-Southeast of Heel Stone.

[b]c)[/b] E-SE Stonehenge Artifact Burial mound is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock. [b]Source:[/b] 3/4 of the original complete circle of Counterscarp limestone first (1st) stone hedge of Stonehenge.

[b]d)[/b] 56 Aubrey Hole remnants are foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock.

[b]e)[/b] Heel Stone ditch bottom-half is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock, and not silted in fill. [b]Source:[/b] Counterscarp causeway or Stonehenge mound.

[b][i]Palaeontology, geochemistry, and mineralogy of Carboniferous age limestone is different than that of Cretaceous age chalk, and has been verified by evolution and extinction of species. Many of the elder white stone fossils died out long before the Cretaceous, and likewise, many of the younger white chalk fossils did not evolve until the Jurassic, or at the earliest, Triassic. Differentiating fossiliferous white limestone from fossiliferous white chalk was a simple task for the ancient fossil collectors. Some of the key fossils are quite huge before they were fragmented and moved.[/i][/b]

01) [i]Aclisina[/i]
02) [i]Aviculopecten[/i]
03) [i]Bellerophon[/i]
04) [i]Caninia cornucopiae[/i]
05) [i]Chondrites[/i]
06) [i]Cleiothyridina roissyi[/i]
07) [i]Composita[/i]
08) [i]Conocardium[/i]
09) [i]Delepinea (Daviesiella) destinezi[/i]
10) [i]Euphemites[/i]
11) [i]Girvanella[/i]
12) [i]Hapsiphyllum (Zaphrentis) konincki[/i]
13) [i]Linoproductus[/i]
14) [i]Megachonetes papilionaceous[/i]
15) [i]Michelina grandis[/i]
16) [i]Mourlonia[/i]
17) [i]Murchisonia[/i]
18) [i]Palaeosmilia[/i]
19) [i]Plicochonetes[/i]
20) [i]Rhipidomella michelini[/i]
21) [i]Schellwienella cf. S. crenistria[/i]
22) [i]Straparollus[/i]
23) [i]Syringopora[/i]
24) [i]Zoophycos[/i]

Kind regards,

[b]Garry William Denke[/b]
[b]Geologist/Geophysicist[/b]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.