Seminar Question for Group 2 from Group 7 -- GEOFORUM

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:22:32 09/30/01 Sun
Author: Matthew Lim on behalf of Group 7
Subject: Seminar Question for Group 2 from Group 7

Seminar Question for Group 2 from Group 7

For Group 2:
Dear Group 2, you cited one reason of rejecting the housing property deal as coastal erosion, are you suggesting that it is by a cliff near the sea (this is just to clarify)? the question we would like to ask is: Will you be accepting a bungalow that is on a steep hillside where it sits on a terraced piece of land, which means that the bungalow is facing an upslope on one side and a downslope on another, but it is sitting with quite some distance in the middle)? We hope that the question is clear enough.

Thank you very much.

Yours sincerely,
Group 7

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]