VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:57:17 03/23/04 Tue
Author: 淇少俠
Subject: 政治的主觀與客觀
In reply to: AJ 's message, "時事整理分析(1) 320總統大選後 <訴訟程序>" on 08:10:09 03/23/04 Tue

姑且勿論總統大選如何,
讓我們先解構政治的主觀性與客觀性,
在討論政治時, 前者是必須的,
因為如果在談論政治時沒有主觀性主見,
立場搖擺不定, 所有的立論將會崩潰,
討論便得毫無意思.

然而, 後者也是必須的,
因為如果只有主觀性思想,
事實很大可能的受到情感影響而大幅曲解,
所以客觀處理事實也是談論政治的必要條件.

可是, 兩者又如何消除矛盾而共存呢?
我的建議是先從主觀性思想出發並再用客觀性思想解讀,
例如綠營支持者除了一邊同情陳水扁中槍的同時,
想一想陰謀論的假設, 並再用客觀理性反駁.

最後我想說一句,
談政治可能是出於一個主觀性想法,
不過過程務必以理性處理,
如果你的家人能夠明白這議政之道,
便再無尷尬不尷尬, 因為大家也只是議事論事.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • 以美國為例 -- 淇少俠, 09:03:53 03/23/04 Tue
    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.