VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:22:36 08/29/04 Sun
Author: 5
Author Host/IP: 4.10.29.62
Subject: Re: More reasons why LitKicks, Inc. and Asher suck
In reply to: dane 's message, "More reasons why LitKicks, Inc. and Asher suck" on 17:39:07 08/22/04 Sun

>
>
>Imagine this (and this "profile"--which is not me--
>fits quite a few litkickers or former litkickers, male
>and female):
>
>you are a writer--not the greatest, not the worst,
>above the average cafe hack, perhaps. Your writing is
>direct, honest, unsentimental--occasionally graphic
>and erotic, and violent. YOu write about death.
>absurdity. prisons. war. capitalism. sex. whores.
>even wax a bit philosophical now and then.... You try
>to avoid cliches. Maybe you have even been published
>or praised by academics or in newspapers or online.
>
>you post to some e-zines and websites, and one day
>discover litkicks. checking it out, you like a few
>posted pieces but see much juvenile angst and fluff.
>you post some. a few people read u, hardly anyone
>responds. u see some clown or bimbo posting and her
>writing is about that of a high school junior's diary.
> and yet she is a "regular". and people actually
>praise her, though her (or his) writing is really just
>useless fluff
>
>one day you write some flames about the garbage u
>read. arguments ensue, anger grows, insults and
>profanity increases. after some time u are suddenly
>"bounced"--without reason or warning-- and your
>writing vanishes. even some pieces you had not saved.
>gone. yet the regulars that had said things as
>horrible or worse than you, and were really quite
>awful writers, remain
>
>that is litkicks for many people.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: More reasons why LitKicks, Inc. and Asher suck -- Quine's spittal, 13:01:55 09/01/04 Wed (210.246.12.40)
  • Re: More reasons why LitKicks, Inc. and Asher suck -- there's a place for u, too, 08:23:46 09/02/04 Thu (4.27.250.92)
  • . . . -- . . . . ., 15:58:57 09/23/04 Thu (207.44.154.35)
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.