VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]
Subject: Re: 聖經的邊界不清晰使特殊啟示論出現困難


Author:
Ken_Reformed
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 18:37:51 11/06/04 Sat
In reply to: Liberal 's message, "聖經的邊界不清晰使特殊啟示論出現困難" on 17:52:31 11/06/04 Sat

教會歷史的記載告訴我們﹐ 聖經正典的確定是通過了許多大公會議的商討的﹐ 所以﹐ 我們可發現﹐ 今時今日我們手頭上拿著的聖經其實並不是上帝從天而降的“天書”﹐ 它的形成充滿了人為的因素﹐ 我們可以說﹐ 聖經仿彿要經過“人”這一重關卡才得以形成。 於是﹐ 自由派以此為由﹐ 認為也許神的啟示在正典以外的次經也出現﹐ 所以﹐ 以改革宗和普遍福音派的六十六卷書為例﹐ 這六十六卷書未必是神特殊啟示之全部﹐ 因為次經也許同樣有啟示。

然而﹐ 我會反問反對特殊啟示論的自由派﹕ 就算(是假設的)次經可能同樣包含神的啟示﹐ 也不足以成為反對特殊啟示論的理據﹐ 因為我們最多最多也只能說特殊啟示存在于大公會議爭議過的少數次經﹐ 無論如何我們也無法以此為理由推翻特殊啟示論。 怎可以由於次經也可能有啟示﹐ 而結論道特殊啟示論不正確呢﹖

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.