VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]
Subject: 誰說答案一定只能有一個?


Author:
Liberal
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:31:21 04/03/04 Sat
In reply to: 約夫 's message, "Re: 閱讀就是解釋---聖經無誤論失去作用" on 22:58:12 03/30/04 Tue

"閱讀不等同解釋。看懂字卻看不懂意思的狀況的確存在。"

看懂字卻看不懂意思叫閱讀失敗---閱讀理解上的失敗(例如在考試閱讀理解中不及格).
看懂意思的閱讀才是完整的閱讀.

你可能會問"既然考試閱讀理解中的題目有標準答案,即是文章的解釋可以獨立於閱讀者的背景,教育,傳統啦,否則個個考生都有自己的答案,何來有人及格?"答:考試閱讀理解中的題目是低層次的事實性的題目,不涉及高層次的哲學、宗教、政治等立場,聖經的解釋則涉及.

=============================================================

"不同的背景,教育,傳統...的人對相同的問題不能有不同的答案存在嗎?誰說答案一定只能有一個。"

正是這樣,所以我說某人或某派從聖經得出的答案只是"不同的答案"中的其中之一,不能提昇到"無誤"的神位.他們卻以為只要為聖經冠上"無誤"之冕,便可手握"無誤"的聖經,從聖經得到獨一的"無誤"答案.我正是要指出,即使聖經有"無誤"之冕,解釋也不是只得一個,不可能"無誤".即使無誤的聖經存在,無誤的閱讀不存在.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.