VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]
Subject: Re: 富豪 會唔會先~ 哈哈哈


Author:
維記
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:29:15 04/13/05 Wed
In reply to: fuho 's message, "Re: 富豪 會唔會先~ 哈哈哈" on 07:37:58 04/13/05 Wed

>愉林的做法是合
>;理的

那要看合誰的理了。
從營商自由來說,書店當然有入貨自由及一己的營商理念,透明度是否足夠也只端在乎幫襯的客仔是否care及是否有信心,而榆林又不是上市公司,所以也不是這次問題的核心。
然而既然榆林有拒絕擺放的自由,那麼一開始就不要擺一個願意接受擺放的姿態,收下人家的東西,就算是後來才發現原來與自己的理念不符,那麼也應該禮貌地通知人家回收,而不是當廢物拋棄;退一步來說,不通知人家回收的話,也沒有犯法,只能算是不禮貌,然而已可以構成人家投訴的合理理由了。好了,現在不但不通知人家,更在人家數次拿上來都不通知對方自己的policy及做法,繼續粒聲唔出,表面上扮開放,一臉歡迎再來的樣子,轉頭卻把人家的一擔心機當垃圾處理,這又算那碼子的營商原則?還可算得說是合理嗎?人家來大興問罪之師就反而變得不合理了嗎?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
感謝維記兄在時代的回應以利達17:27:41 04/13/05 Wed


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.