VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56789 ]
Subject: Re: 不代表什麼宗派... no problem


Author:
蒲生
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:56:12 03/24/05 Thu
In reply to: Clement LO 's message, "Re: 不代表什麼宗派... no problem" on 01:21:12 03/24/05 Thu

同意. "大公教會"的觀念應是較後期的發展 (二三世紀?), 古時交通不便, 不同地方不同文化的基督徒都有不同實踐, 甚至對"信耶穌"和"耶穌"都有不一樣的理解, 最早期的基督徒也未必有從猶太人宗教社團中另起爐灶的新身分認同想法.

第一世紀 (即新約各書卷的大概寫作時代) 應是百家爭嗚, 有點像先秦時代, 也難憑一個保羅就定性如加拉太書的"割禮派"為異端或非基督徒. 所謂正統也是從較後期出現的"正統"的準繩去量度, 作一種"正統"的教會史解說, 如優西比烏所作的.

我基本上接受這種歷史演化為多多少少屬聖靈帶領, 而這確實是一種信仰 (否則我也不想加入或留在取了這種史觀的大公教會), 但我在歷史實證層面, 卻對這些已湮滅或被定性為異端或被迫溶入其他宗教文化的"半"基督徒社團抱肯定態度.

歷史有時都幾複雜, 但我信是向人開放的, 端在乎今天人的取向和意志, 例如, 是致力"團結合一", 還是各自各精彩, 還是其他甚麼的.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.