| Subject: Re: Karl Barth? |
Author:
XOX
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 10:52:40 02/08/05 Tue
In reply to:
蒲生
's message, "Re: 關於巴特" on 10:13:40 02/08/05 Tue
Well, Barth didn't believed the Bible is inerrant, he maybe a orthodox, but in this way he is closer to being a modern day Liberal Christian than with the conservative.
******************************************
Barth's theology assumes a certain amount of the tenets of liberal Christianity, most notably the assumption that the Bible is not historically and scientifically accurate. Barth has been called by fundamentalist Christianity a "neo-Orthodox" because, while his theology retains most or all of the tenets of Christianity, he rejects Biblical inerrancy. His reconciliation of having a rigorous Christian theology without a supporting text that was considered to be historically accurate was to separate theological truth from historical truth. It is arguably for this belief that Barth has been criticized the most harshly by more conservative Christians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Barth
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
