Legislation encourage more people to be homosexuals (JPY) -- ��ۥѬ��Яd�� Liberal Christian Forum of Hong Kong

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Legislation encourage more people to be homosexuals (JPY)

Author:
XOX

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:55:27 04/27/05 Wed
In reply to: XOX 's message, "Posts from ignorant Christian at ��ѩR site" on 10:52:56 04/27/05 Wed

What kind of protection are we looking for?

To protect men who get caught from having sexual intercourse with another men from being sent to jail as long as they alleged they are homosexual.

To protect them from starving, being homeless, �K as long as they are homosexual.

To protect them from losing education, jobs, friends, parents, �K for whatever reason, as long as they are homosexual.

To ensure them having respect from others without being judged (without trial) �K as long as they are homosexual.

Are we building a new privileged class? Should we give them double votes in election? In fact, not all non-homosexual people could enjoy these protections. Why should they?

The HK government is now considering how to help the poor. One argument is to set the poverty line(s). The controversy lies on where this poverty line should be set. Should we make sure the poor (even though they are simply unfortunate but not for other reasons) could enjoy sea-view apartments, overseas trips, quality entertainment, movies and karaoke, �K?

No wonder there are concerns that the anti-discrimination law could encourage more people (to allege) to be homosexual. It will not just be trendy but really beneficial.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]