VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456 ]
Subject: 其實好明白亦同意Lincoln兄的原則看法. 但恐怕在短期內,那些評分準則都難會被收改,除非馬會內部人事突然有重有改變!


Author:
Richard
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:51:18 01/20/06 Fri
Author Host/IP: NoHost/202.71.202.202
In reply to: Lincoln 's message, "正如起言所講評磅沒有一套一致認同的準則,但大前提是公平,沒有任何因素可置諸其前.問題不只在富有心得與聚寶駒的關係,最明顯是評磅員這樣送位置給富有心得,又或者像之前的再戰群雄在75分贏馬後竟還留在第三班,是對同場的馬主不公平.假如我是第三班馬主,就不想與再戰群雄同場,因這馬能在75分贏馬,已有充足理據升上第二班,有那個馬主願意與超班馬同場(旨在串Q者除外)?但他們已別無選擇,因不知再戰群雄幾時出賽." on 15:08:20 01/20/06 Fri


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.