Discrepancies in Viscous Flux Formulas -- CFD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:08:52 04/26/04 Mon
Author: Arastoo
Subject: Discrepancies in Viscous Flux Formulas
In reply to: Arastoo 's message, "Harten" on 21:48:23 04/26/04 Mon

As we see, the four Flux Formulas ,which has beeb presented in the Prject #1, make good results,when they are used for Invisid mode,but in Viscous,the fail to meet the requirment except, Roe's.
I think the main reason for this(Descrepancy in results) ,arise form truncation errors in invisid formulas and Diffusion fluxes(viscous fluxes) counterparts, which in viscous mode,they are not the same order as hey were in invisid itself.
may be ,diffution terms, dominent,and effect the invisid fluxes ,which makes the boundry layer thicker.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Discrepancies in Viscous Flux Formulas -- Karim Mazaheri, 01:55:24 04/27/04 Tue