VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:49:53 04/27/04 Tue
Author: mehdi sedighi
Subject: Re: If you have problem with Van Leer method...
In reply to: Reza Khaksar fard 's message, "Re: If you have problem with Van Leer method..." on 06:08:26 04/22/04 Thu

>>>You should notice that (F) in the right hand of
>>>equations (69) & (72) means equation (11)
>>Thank you Reza, This really helped me.
>>Could you get accurate results for viscous part, using
>>Van Leer method?
>You're welcome Ashkan
>No I could not get accurate results by Van Leer method
>and I think there is no problem .Van Leer method is
>NOT accurate .
is it essential to solve with method 3th and 4th

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.